On the gravestone of the murdered Terri Schindler Schiavo still another third date is noted beside the birth and the day of death. In addition flowers stand at the grave of the verdursteten Terri. They dipped into water. Of Hochw. Franc Pavone, chairman of „priest for the life “.

(kreuz.net) recent had I the privilege to bless the grave of Terri Schindler Schiavo. Terri became to 31. March by Verhungern and draining murders.

Terris grave is nearby the place, at which she died, and where humans met from all over the world, in order to pray and demonstrate.

The visitors of the grave something zuhöchst unusual to notice. While at most graves two data are engraved - the birth and the dying date - give it on Terris gravestone three:

Born on 3 December 1963

Gone from this earth on 25 February 1990

Come to the peace to 31. March 2005

The whole world knows that Terri to 31. March 2005 died. The American media as well as journalists from all over the world were for days present. They reported each detail. Also there the media were, when I preached with the funeral fair. We know, when them died.

But their gravestone became the pulpit of the euthanasia movement. Those, which murdered her, use their last Ruhestätte as platform for their rotated ideology.

Which they try to say, it is that Terri did not function any longer longer, like someone from us. That it no more one of us was, than it was injured at that time in the year 1990: It „went from this world “:

This way of thinking is a variation of old erring teachings, which state that we are in reality „spirit “, which inhabits a body. Terri could not speak no more. Therefore it must have left it „spirit “. The body was left like a bowl.

The people, which believe that them are really in the year 1990 „from this world gone “, therefore that it can itself fool correct was, them in the year 2005 to kill. After the event it did not concern the helpless killing any longer really. It had already gone.

That is a Häresie. The Christianity says us that we are a unit of body and soul, and not only simply „uses a body “. Which we do the body, that we do to the person.

Beyond that the inscription at the gravestone means a deep offense all handicapped humans and those, which provide for it. Also should they be already regarded as dead? Do we waste our time, if we worry about them?

Apologeten of the helpless killing would bring us gladly on such thoughts.

Recently there was a headline over a handicapped unborn child. Someone was quoted with the sentence: „It does not concern human life there. “

Isn't that the same way of thinking? It assumes the child is gone from this earth „already “. Therefore they do not hesitate also to drive the baby off.

When I blessed Terris grave, I prayed to God that all humans may remain retained by this lügnerischen attitude.

And I had to think of it, like I on day, when she died, in Terris rooms was. I remembered its face: drained, because she had not gotten a drop water in two weeks.

I saw the flowers - meter far from its night small box removes. They had dived into water.

And as I the grave left, looked I again to the Blumenvase at the gravestone.

Yersinia: @dilletatus: or this discussion around an aspect

expanded;

Benedikt78: Differences

It is now unfortunately a tragic fact that in many countries humans are hungry and verhungern, because the life circumstances are catastrophic. Particularly in Africa one can observe well, how despots let their people be hungry and at the western relief supplies to enrich itself. Simbabwe is an example.

But one cannot compare world hunger with the case Terri Schiavo. Terri Schiavo one let its life receive verhungern, although one had the possibility.

Now Terri Schiavo is dead. By this death is another life saved? Verhungert now humans less in the developing countries? Probably hardly. Why as this reference?

A comparison can one only cynical call.

I would be therefore glad, if we can to terminate and essentially the case talk this point now!

dilettantus into interrete: Rate Mitdiskutanten!

Now „Tierra dels Fuego are not a refutation of the French grammar “(Tucholsky). A murder is not entkräftigt by hunger in criminal structures; and in reverse one cannot survey verhungernde humans by the case Schiavo.

Who such a homicide argument as the first used did not only leave but actually terminated the discussion

Yersinia: @Brandenburgis: explain you please more near!

surely, it is by verse, if daily a so large number of humans dies simply by hunger - humans, who die in other connections by unfair economic structures and profit greed, are there still not at all taken in account; by verse is it also, if in other world areas the abuse of measurer and fork is one of the most frequent causes of death at the same time; but well that you see hypocrisy in this connection with me -

methusalix †: Hello yersinia,

our brothers in the Mr. WOOLS the truth did not write you plain and simply to the knowledge to take. This truth would know its carefully zurechtgezimmertes conception of the world in staggers to bring. Therefore one rather fades out the facts of this world and insults the deliverer of the bad message. In former times was still worse; there one heated the messengers correctly. Think they only of the poor Giordano Bruno.

angel the gentleman: @Brandenburgis

Yersinia is ill. Do not deal best barmherzig its and otherwise anywhere more with it.