„Nonsense and of fools writes “
Of possible pc. Pöltner bishops, which circulates for some days, one is to ignore the Fünferliste with names best, meant one of the candidates.
(, pc. Pölten/Vienna kreuz.net) in the today's expenditure of the Austrian daily paper `chronicle N [ieder] is Kurier' Ö [sterreich] “on page 10 an article of Martin wows to the topic under the column „: „Desire list for new bishop - Küng looks for `Mitregenten' for its Diözese/speculation around five candidates “.Pc. Pölten lies 55 kilometers to the west of Vienna.
In the article on „appropriate messages in the conservative Internet platform kreuz.net “purchase is taken.
These messages are, so Generalvikar Leopold Schagerl literally „nonsense “and „of fools written. One should ignore that at the best one “.
That does not do `the Kurier' however. It takes history very seriously and is concerned with of `kreuz.net' mentioned the five candidates for the office of a bishop in the Diözese pc. Pölten.
Generalvikar Leopold Schagerl is described of the courier as „robust pragmatist “, Hw. Johann Zarl as „popular (r) Dechant “. Rain Anton Leichtfried embodies „the type of manager “.
The secretary of the Austrian bishop conference, Ägidius Zsifkovics, is „a man from the catholic power background “and the Zisterzienserpater Karl Wallner „member of the diözesanen football team and Fitneßfan “.
According to opinion `of the Kurier' all completely useful candidates are obvious.
In a statement before the same daily paper against it the bischöfliche secretary explains Pölten, Hw of pc. Bernhard Augustin, the names for „not relevantly “.
„The names or their carrier? “- to it an inquired creditor from the Diözese pc. commentates Pölten.
3 reader opinions:Tuesday, 17 January 2006 08:11
Midshipman Casey: With of the…
… I had to think article heading automatically of the pro Vita party program 
Monday, 16 January 2006 20:29
kurt usar: no art project
I do not believe that cross net an art project is and I have here already much interesting found.
this contribution is however really not once of subregionalem interest, unfortunate around the place.
this contribution is however really not once of subregionalem interest, unfortunate around the place.
Monday, 16 January 2006 19:48
Yersinia: for what actually the speculations?
but meanwhile I arrived at the conviction that kreuz.net is an art project;
The editorship does not take responsibility for contents of the contributions. She reserves herself the right to delete contributions as well as to exclude readers from the debate.
Appointments:
