A reason to celebrating?
Women should see that 8 March is one mourning day, as long as annually 25 million female humans the Abtreibungskloake are down-rinsed. Of male humans completely to silence. By Klaus Günter Annen.
(, Weinheim kreuz.net) on the today's so-called international world woman day world-wide many woman federations make on social erroneous trends attentive.Are called for example force against women and children, slave trade and obligation prostitution.
In addition they remind of in the last decades the reached so-called progress, like for example denying the life right of unborn humans.
Of the woman federations it is misjudged that with the horrible child abortion the largest and hinterhältigste willingness to use violence becomes against humans expenditure-practiced and certified.
This obviously of a majority of the occupation women carried force against the own sex costs annually world-wide approximately 50 million children the life - of it is about half of female sex.
Since end of the Second World War mothers have usually without resistance certified that over 3.000.000.000 - three billion - unborn humans were slaughtered world-wide still before the birth.
These murdered humans were protection-worthiest and most helpless humans at all.
In view of these facts „the initiative asks never again! “from Weinheim: Is that a reason to celebrating?
No, that is a reason to investigate the conscience and in bag and ashes go.
Klaus Günter Annen is the press spokesman of the European citizens' initiative to the protection of the life and „never again! “
All reader opinions indicate
6 of 16 reader opinions:
Friday, 10 March 2006 09:01
GerdEric: @ Thomas's A. Höck
Thomas's A. Höck: GerdEric of the family planners „whether a child live should “(GerdEric) is in nobody „decision “put, and which you call „family planning “is not anything as the popular euphemistische Abtreibervokabel for murder.
I assume,
that you mean articles read…
not I am for these „Greek “- heidnische variant „of family planning “,
however it was approved of at the beginning of „Christian “mission acres,
like evenly also pork…
Whether a child left “the man is to live these first „mission acres,
and a Paulus was so far Greek,
that it wanted the woman to the silence gates.
Your cheap attempt,
me sympathy for these „family planning “anzudichten,
none will seriously take here.
(that was my first post office for today)
I assume,
that you mean articles read…
not I am for these „Greek “- heidnische variant „of family planning “,
however it was approved of at the beginning of „Christian “mission acres,
like evenly also pork…
Whether a child left “the man is to live these first „mission acres,
and a Paulus was so far Greek,
that it wanted the woman to the silence gates.
Your cheap attempt,
me sympathy for these „family planning “anzudichten,
none will seriously take here.
(that was my first post office for today)
Thursday, 9 March 2006 13:06
bonifatius: @Xixax: Nothing
Bread and roses were called circenses before 2000 years in panem et.
Which is now with mother love, responsibility, obligations, tasks, „you are not to kill “?! Xixax: Nothing?
Which is now with mother love, responsibility, obligations, tasks, „you are not to kill “?! Xixax: Nothing?
Thursday, 9 March 2006 10:18
_xyz_: GerdEric of the family planners
„whether a child should live “(GerdEric) is in nobody „decision “put, and which you call „family planning “is not anything as the popular euphemistische Abtreibervokabel for murder.
Thursday, 9 March 2006 10:12
GerdEric: @ Thomas's A. Höck
Thomas's A. Höck: Children to bear is by nature thing of the woman! To their „decision “becomes it only if the abortion medical profession open the possibility to them of making vorgeburtliche killings and of preventing births thereby. And that does not have to do nothing at all with „nature “!
In old Athens (?) the fathers could decide,
whether a child should live,
but there were public places,
at those then the father the decision met,
that was then abortion after the birth…
(unfortunately momentarily the proofs are missing to me, but me it is there in memory that this „also in the beginnings of the Greek Christianity was entitled to right “the men…)
Nachgeburtliche „family planning “was always rather man thing,
in times,
when rights of the women were not valid for anything,
when women were legally no more,
as a thing with two legs were…
„Church “time enough had nearly 2000 years,
to plant the values of the faith into the hearts of humans,
but also their representative only their egoism served.
HP.:
unfortunately I here (probably as only (also a kind Previleg) may) write only five post office…
In old Athens (?) the fathers could decide,
whether a child should live,
but there were public places,
at those then the father the decision met,
that was then abortion after the birth…
(unfortunately momentarily the proofs are missing to me, but me it is there in memory that this „also in the beginnings of the Greek Christianity was entitled to right “the men…)
Nachgeburtliche „family planning “was always rather man thing,
in times,
when rights of the women were not valid for anything,
when women were legally no more,
as a thing with two legs were…
„Church “time enough had nearly 2000 years,
to plant the values of the faith into the hearts of humans,
but also their representative only their egoism served.
HP.:
unfortunately I here (probably as only (also a kind Previleg) may) write only five post office…
Thursday, 9 March 2006 10:01
_xyz_: GerdEric
GerdEric: more >Kinder to bear decision of the Frau< is by nature only
Children to bear is by nature thing of the woman! To their „decision “becomes it only if their abortion physician open the possibility of making vorgeburtliche killings and of preventing births thereby. And that does not have to do nothing at all with „nature “!
(Corrected one version, from there gepostet again!)
Children to bear is by nature thing of the woman! To their „decision “becomes it only if their abortion physician open the possibility of making vorgeburtliche killings and of preventing births thereby. And that does not have to do nothing at all with „nature “!
(Corrected one version, from there gepostet again!)
Thursday, 9 March 2006 09:56
Benedikt: Mother day
To that extent is the mother day (even if it in Dtl. of the Nazis) the better anniversary was introduced.
The mother day in Germany was not introduced of the Nazis. The first as a mother day committed day in Germany was the 13. May 1923.
And who hats introduced to Germany? Correctly: The federation of German flower shop owners.
The mother day in Germany was not introduced of the Nazis. The first as a mother day committed day in Germany was the 13. May 1923.
And who hats introduced to Germany? Correctly: The federation of German flower shop owners.
All reader opinions indicate
10 further reader opinions
The editorship does not take responsibility for contents of the contributions. She reserves herself the right to delete contributions as well as to exclude readers from the debate.





