Friday, 10 March 2006 15:49
What, do children to have want you also?
The German catholics will probably already soon understand, why the church employed person regarded married women in former times than „reason-requiring special case “.
(, Berlin) who kreuz.net my, the ideal of the mother, that remains as a family woman at home and worries about her children, while the man worries himself around the income, `the Frankfurt general Zeitung' belongs on 10 February 2006 to the value system of the catholic church, erred, reported.

The archbishop of Berlin, George cardinal Sterzinsky was met three days before, in the citizens of Berlin `catholic Akademie' on Federal Minister for Family Affairs Ursula of the Leyen (CDU).

Cardinal Sterzinsky is a chairman „of the commission marriage and family “of the German bishop conference.

„A goal-safe Einwurf “of the layman representative of the German catholics, Hans Joachim Meyer, lured the cardinal on this occasion from the reserve.

Meyer deplored that the church employed person women had treated much to for a long time as „reason-requiring special case “. Therefore many women the right to vote between professional activity or pure family work remained refused.

In his answer cardinal Sterzinsky did not even strive to contradict the chairman `of the central committee of the German Katholiken'.

„The old model was spread “over generations, and a great many would have probably-felt with it, meant the cardinal according to data `of the Frankfurt ones Allgemeinen'.

But the church referred another position not only with the occurrence of the personifizierten compatibility by family and occupation in shape of woman of the Leyen.

Cardinal Sterzinsky quoted a social word of the German bishops from the conditions from the year 1996.

Therein the freedom is demanded of fathers and mothers to connect occupation and family after own conceptions: „Whether that got around itself already sufficiently, did not add white I “, the cardinal.

For the fulfillment of the family obligations the cardinal offered a simple solution. He meant related to the marriage partners: „Those are to divide, as they want. “

Even support from the first year of life on does not have to be bad „at all “.

There remained even for the Secretary of Family Affairs spit away.

It meant addressed to cardinal and public that eighty per cent of the women between 25 and 40 years in the meantime were gainfully employed:

„It will be not the question, whether women work, but only whether children part their are lives or not. “

An obvious conclusion, on which the unlocked cardinal did not count however perhaps nevertheless.
All reader opinions indicate 6 of 14 reader opinions:
Monday, 13. March 2006 17:51
miroguh: @Stimme
Apology!
Monday, 13. March 2006 14:54
Kath.Net probably limits the number of characters,…
(please the two lines join, kath.net have probably a line delimitation)

Please always „kath.net “do not write, if kreuz.net is meant. There is not any identity between the two Internet web pages.
Monday, 13. March 2006 14:20
miroguh: at Abu
Kath.Net limits probably the number of characters, therefore complete article under
http://www.wikiwelt.de/index.php/
Was%2C_Kinder_haben_wollen_Sie_auch
(please the two lines join, kath.net have probably a line delimitation)

Abu wrote:
„„“, I must call Uff only once, because a merry majority is together, those the children their mummy wishes here and not different sidings! “

I understand not completely, on which you want outside. I think, each reasonable humans am for an children's education, which supplies a as large development possibility and an equal chances as possible to the children with. Only, as this may give to reach over it to actual naturally different opinions.

„@miroguh: The consequences v.a. the collective foreign support can one reread with Christa Meves, not ith S. of a lampoon from reactionary convicition, but supported of the empirical research. Even the FAZ referred in a editorial recently to these realizations. Briefly: It harms. “

You mean this Christa Meves?: http://www.christa-meves.de/
On their web page I could unfortunately recognize none left to a appreciative refereed journal. Possibly this is in its books - those are unfortunately not accessible to me however. I would assume now however times that it might be extremely difficult to occupy such theses. You know not coincidentally investigations in the direction?
Monday, 13. March 2006 10:44
Abu: @miroguh: Foreign care sequences
„“, I must call Uff only once, because a merry majority is together, those the children their mummy wishes here and not different sidings!

@miroguh: The consequences v.a. the collective foreign support can one reread with Christa Meves, not ith S. of a lampoon from reactionary convicition, but supported of the empirical research. Even the FAZ referred in a editorial recently to these realizations. Briefly: It harms.

My judgement must a child to articulate know itself and it must that want, before one gives it to other hands. And parents have the obligation to the education, not Deligierte. V.a. should not force one its internal feeling away, which says to one: Small people flax needs mummy and dad, allowance, confidenceness, welfare service - love.
Sunday, 12. March 2006 16:27
miroguh: @Elendster Sünder
Most miserable Sünder wrote: „[…] The life of such children ends pretty often in station toilets with a syringe in the arm. “

You can naturally refer to quotable investigations, those
* prove, how many children buy their lunch at 14 o'clock alone,
* show that these children in families with employed mothers live and
* the probability that these children become drug dependent, is significantly higher than other children, states.

If you have references for this, then call please the sources. Otherwise you should waive yourself such quotations for the table reserved for regulars.

Many greetings,
Miroguh
Saturday, 11. March 2006 23:53
Pius X.: @Kardinal Sterzinsky
In the autumn it gave an interview controlled by him to 1992 in the citizens of Berlin morning mail that it wishes the Frauenpriestertum soon. In the sequential edition it corrected because of objection of Rome, it wrongly was probably quoted: It wants the Frauenpriestertum only starting from 2000, in all other respects is not faith-obligating the dogmas kath. of the church.
All reader opinions indicate 8 further reader opinions
The editorship does not take responsibility for contents of the contributions. She reserves herself the right to delete contributions as well as to exclude readers from the debate.
Copyright © 2008 kreuz.net