Monday, 10 April 2006 18:38
The Homo infiltration in the Klerus
„Also teaching profession-faithful bishops cannot prevent scandals, if they remain passive and not to guarantee that their priests obey the moral requirements “. By Dr. Gerard J.M. van the Aardweg, psychologist and specialist in questions of homosexuality.
(kreuz.net) history shows that arising the artificial Empfängnisverhütung and the increase of the homosexual of behavior are twin phenomena.

When before fifty years the opinion became yardable that the normal Heterosexualität could be lived detached of the ideal of the conjugal loyalty and openness for children, may do and even must do, entered homosexuality the stage.

Something something similar occurred itself in the church.

Bishops and priests, who pushed shut an eye before the preventing mentality or even defended them, opened the way for a rapid Homosexualisierung of the Klerus.

Indeed many Homo scandals in Diözesen occurred, where there was an above average degree at open or hidden resistance against the encyclical `Humanae Vitae'.

In addition, teaching profession-faithful bishops cannot prevent such scandals, if they remain passive and not to guarantee that their priests in sexual regard the moral requirements of the divine right attach, these to obey and consistently not preach and teach.

Youngest occurrences in famous Austrian seminar for priests of pc. Pölten - to call that in the meantime a decided and reliable cleaning experienced - or that one, which occurred before ten years in the not less historical Netherlands seminar for priests of Rolduc - around only two rather coincidental examples - warns before the thoughtless acceptance that there it are in Diözesen, which admits as rechtgläubig is only glitterndes rechtgläubiges gold.

The humanistic ideology does not make also before the threshold of faith-faithful institutions stop.

Therefore only the United States are not concerned. Also the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Austria, Italy, even catholic Poland, experienced, are their portion of open or hidden Homo scandals it in progressive or in rechtgläubigen circles.

The homosexual bent priest a new feature is not certain. But much points to that the phenomenon increased for the past 1960er year in Europe strongly.

It is a very careful estimation that 10% of the Western European priests exhibit homosexual orientations. There and there this number could be twice as high. In the general population it amounts to no more than 2%.

Something is not certainly correct thus. The problem of actual besides said - not specifically catholic. In Protestant circles the things do not lie differently.

From personal experience and contacts with many west and northEuropean countries am I with the fact trusts that numerous male Protestant preachers and theology student exhibit homoerotische inclinations, independently of their church affiliation and theological adjustment: Reformed, Lutheraner, Anglikaner, Evangelikale and supporter of so-called free churches.

With female theology students and minister inside the impression exists likewise that the Lesbianismus is over-represented, although it is more difficult there than with men realistic estimations to make.

The fact that nearly all Protestant communities accept Homo Konkubinate or homosexual cult servant, does not mean that there are in this connection no tensions there. Quite the reverse.

Next time: What is the problem exact with priests with Homo inclinations?
The article is part of the following row:
3. The Homo infiltration in the Klerus
All reader opinions indicate 6 of 47 reader opinions:
Sunday, 16 April 2006 23:29
hello times: homounterwanderung in klerus
which they write together in such a way there everything, one can also only write, because there is the Internet, otherwise one with such mitteralterlichen conception over sexuality no podium would find. If God is responsible for sexuality and not we as natures erschaffene of God, then there were evenly only Heterosexulle and this concept does not go already since thousands of years, on otherwise gave it no wars, above all Religionskriege and if one stop no longer further white, then evenly humans come and because of its sexual assessment are condemned.
There are angels and Satane and to which counts it itself actually on their unworldly Gewä??
We humans live and are missing and therefore live we also around us to find and in the good one be with God and the world, longings etc. after Buddhismus are in all and THEM are a terrible example of the hate.
I hope only it to them will assign.
Let they nevertheless humans with their emergencies in peace it know exactly that they are not faultless.
hello times
Saturday, 15 April 2006 22:06
humans: Which the church means is wurscht me…
… however like the church do not opinion-make against homosexuals operates is simply for freedom-loving and upright humans acceptable.
But which I talk me actually here the mouth fusselig? Actually harm at my time.
And on Saturday evening…
Thursday, 13 April 2006 08:53
Gerhard: The fragment in the own eye
The author of this contribution just as little like being many readers in this forum one does not seem clear:
The joys and suffering in handling own sexuality are for homo as for heterosexual humans the same! The same is valid also for handling a zölibatären life: none bring along here the better or the worse conditions!
Before someone tries to remove the fragment from the eye of its brother, he should become conscious the bar in its own eye!
Wednesday, 12 April 2006 19:18
Lohengrin: typically Kreuz.net
The article is like the church: lied and wrongly! Full unproven postulates, laughful assumptions and doctrinaire contradictory. In short: A törichter muck!
Wednesday, 12 April 2006 17:34
Loc Fethyr: @ Benedikt
I criticized the church, but only the comments of some faith supporters in keinster way. In addition I criticize the design Islam, that humans strongly very probably limit or, in another case, which Djihad proclaims. Exactly the same I criticize the Hardcore Protstanten in the USA and the katholizistischen excrescences eniger user. That is liberty of opinion. Because I limit others in such a way not, but communicate to you mean point of view. I am pleased however in you a diskutablen user to have found.
Wednesday, 12 April 2006 16:52
Benedikt: @ Loc Fethyr
An illness is homosexuality indeed not. But which according to opinion of the church sin is, you leave times prettily to the teaching profession. If you are not catholic, you this view can be also all the same. In the Islam that is foods of pig a sin. Interests it also?

Because of me you can criticize the views, with rushing have alone the statement statement that HS sin is not nothing at all to do. Independently of it I agree you with the fact that some contributions have quite a character, which does not agree at all with the Katechismus of the church (according to which is to be met homosexuals with behaviour and clock).
All reader opinions indicate 41 further reader opinions
The editorship does not take responsibility for contents of the contributions. She reserves herself the right to delete contributions as well as to exclude readers from the debate.
Copyright © 2008 kreuz.net