Recently an Italian cardinal spoke over moral topics. It involved itself with topics such as condoms, child abortion, child cells and helpless murder into many contradictions to the church teachings.

(kreuz.net) the Italian week magazine `Espresso' published yesterday a discussion of Carlo Maria Kardinal Martini (79) with the Italian Bioethiker Ignazio Marino.

The Jesuit and former archbishop took position of Milan to moral-theological questions.

In connection with the immunodeficiency illness AIDS the cardinal that it gives certain situations, meant with which the use of a Präservativs the smaller evil is.

If at a married couple a partner is infected by the HIV virus, the two would have to use Latexhäute with the conjugal act.

An AIDS patient is committed „to protect its partner and also to these must the right have, to protect itself “, explained the church prince.

The question is however, „whether it task of the church is real, in certain cases loud for such contraceptives to use itself “.

A catholic moral theologian explained against it January last yearly already to at the end of that a conjugal act behind rubber safety divices was a form of the self satisfaction and therefore morally despicable.

The use of condoms is to be compared with two marriage partners, who kiss themselves by a plastic bag through, in order to avoid a hepatitis infection.

It gives human diseases, which make the conjugal act impossible. In addition for example AIDS belongs.

In the discussion cardinal Martini expressed itself also at the beginning of the human life. This takes its beginning „not with the Empfängnis, but afterwards “.

Thus cardinal seems Martini the use of the child killing pill thereafter as well as the research at child cells, which the killing presupposes of infants, to agree.

Cardinal Martini welcomed reducing and exclude also national regulations to the child abortion, if they would contribute to it, „illegal abortions “, repeats the cardinal the argument of the supporters of the vorgeburtlichen child killing.

Nevertheless there may not be „license to killing “.

The cardinal welcomes it also that the state does not destroy frozen babies, but to the adoption release -, if a unmarried person adopts this child: Parents lots of children would have the right to live in a family which consists of man and woman. „However it is clear that also different persons, even, can give Singles in this connection some warranties “:

„I would not be limited around it to only one possibility. The responsible persons are to determine, which is the best solution for a child “, said cardinal Martini.

In the end the emeritierte archbishop doubted also the church teachings, which protect each human life of the Empfängnis up to natural death.

To the euthanasia cardinal explained Martini that one could endorse the gesture of a person, who leads another humans to death never - particularly, if the Todbringer is a physician.

„Nevertheless I cannot even condemn a person, who implements such an act from pure Altruismus due to the request of a person, who is at the end. “

Separate: Main cells

Stem cell researchers become ever more ueberheblicher: Alan Colman, Chief Executive Officer that IT Cell international in Singapore, which cloned the Dolly sheep before ten years, has WI, the USA, which compared embryonic main cells with the fruits of the tree of the life from the Bible on 19 April 2006 with an international master cell symposium in Madison, which to an eternal life will help all humans.

Christin: When does human life begin? When is one called humans?

With the generation?
With that. Development of the body?
With D. Development of the spirit?
Does race kinship d.Zugehörigkeit along to a community?
If I bring in enough money?

Od. if i mine people its accepted and from this which arrange in the order of mother nature.
Or if I humans for the life found with me through thickly and goes thinly.
Or do I become never a human being, if for i never in the grace of the society stand and also to the own development can use my freedom?
If one does not cut my free ideas for me? Am I then humans?
Or if i arranges me voluntarily in a larger whole, which than humans with body and soul is annerkannt, speaks „world “? Mother earth? Father state?
Natural mother, natural father no longer in demand, not importantly? not relevantly? Only on to witness and deliver programmed?
Sadly (
Only if i is seriously taken, then I am humans? One accept of the mother body;
of mother earth?
Only if mine dies +ICH will+, then people its begins, kanns not its;
SADLY

methusalix †: Believe they calmly in it, Laurentius!

Just as few change in the state of affairs, as the firm faith in God. That is also simply there, all the same whether someone believes, or not.

Laurentius2: Condoms do not protect before AIDS!

… the infection is retarded at the most something. To this clear result not libaralistische scientists come completely clearly.

Here click: The end of the condom myth

The statistics against, it stated down, are misleading.

methusalix †: And I answered on the wrong side.

@bonifatius

bonifatius: @ad methusalem, the computing genius

With Sexualrechnungen they seem to be outstanding, there become from a zero equal the number 26. Abstention SAMness is called nevertheless no sexual intercourse has, with which then also no infection danger exists. Yes, if one does not strike the recommendation of the church into the wind is the church guiltily. Otherwise my except-conjugal sexual intercourse might to be present with its 26% meißt, which after the Dekalog again a heavy sin is. This is however nevertheless them eh sausage.
Regret, on a wrong page gepostet before