Sunday, 23 April 2006 13:27
Selective shame
If it concerns the church hate, state journalists prove usually a thick skin, a outstanding stomach and above all no wrong shames. Of Dr. Alfons Adam.
Cutout from the film “snow white and rose-red”
Cutout from the film „snow white and rose-red “
(kreuz.net) I communicate that the broadcast complaint was brought in because of of the ORF Religionsabteilung of published disputed film „for snow white and rose-red “by Ina Loitzl.

The eagerness when collecting the support signatures was this time not completely as large as with history with Adolf Holl. 2,691 signatures accumulated nevertheless.

The procedure over this broadcast complaint is already introductory.

`The Austrian Rundfunk' and his general directress Dr. Monika Lindner delivered a written statement as complaint opponents.

These would have themselves also the ORF Programmdirektor, Dr. Reinhard Scolik, the main department leader for religion, Gerhard small, the transmission responsible person for current reporting and Internet, Norbert Steidl, as well as the transmission responsible person for `cross & Quer', likes. Christoph Guggenberger, attached.

In the statement the film is praised in effusive way.

One of the central moments of the video is the reference to the holy fair, the Eucharist. Into which connection however the Eucharist was placed, which one does not want to see.

A obszöne, or pornografische representation cannot be inferred „from the realistic representation of the female abdomen “allegedly.

Strangely, strangely.

Because for this representation there is a precedent. A shown female abdomen in almost the same attitude was used for the Viennese European Union campaign in last December. The difference consisted above all of that the abdomen was provided with the blue European Union star symbol at that time.

This representation was felt generally as pornography and Herabwürdigung and removed fast again.

I will send the broadcast complaint also to the public prosecutor's office and after § 188 penal code charge because of Herabwürdigung of religious teachings will refund.

Supports become I this complaint on a legal opinion of the Viennese people bar, which very probably came in the case Adolf Holl to the result that this facts constituting an offence is present.

It would be however important in this connection that those , in which the indignation about the injury is expressed.


Dr. Alfons Adam is an attorney in Neulengbach with pc. Pölten and president of the movement for human right on lives `pro Vita'.
All reader opinions indicate 6 of 8 reader opinions:
Monday, 24 April 2006 22:58
centesimus annus: in the medium term…
… Dr. Alfons Adam place 2 behind Martin Humer will take, which concerns right-catholic fundamentalism with involuntary maintenance value. A film is only missing over it…
Sunday, 23 April 2006 19:30
Onan †: @bonifatius
I am more religionshasser no. everyone the religion which it wants, however it should be its private thing, and he/they is not to try out to base the own stubborness the other one to live as possible to make as heavy.

the §188 is sense of dumb.

it undermines the liberty of opinion, on which the right katholen pounds nevertheless always in such a way, if they pull over homosexuals and pregnancy aborts.

but why the Christians should be also differently than all different… liberty of opinion, but only if it is your opinion, or?
Sunday, 23 April 2006 17:06
Karl Murx: Dear Bonifaz, is the progressive attitude Ratziputins my problem?
AIDS fight

Pope wants to permit condoms:
One year after its choice plans Pope Benedikt XVI. an important step during the AIDS fight: The Vatikan wants to permit the use of Präservativen to HIV infecting according to data of a Kurienkardinals.

The church state work on an appropriate document, which is to be published shortly, said the vatikanische „minister of health “, the cardinal Javier Lozano Baragán of the Roman newspaper La Repubblica in an interview, originating from Mexico.
Sunday, 23 April 2006 16:24
centesimus annus: again the through-slammed lawyer, who everything that its opinion is not sued
degrees evenly I wanted to quote and disprove still each individual nonsense, which is located in this article. becomes however for a long time, and also in the hundredth year have I still which other one to do. but already lies, weils in the between file: This representation was felt generally as pornography and Herabwürdigung and removed fast again. is complete nonsense, which was at that time the same people as now, which felt as pornography. In addition rather blasphemously, the opinion, to feel naked bodies as pornography because: did they hear already once of a case, in the God dressed humans do create would have? No? I also not, and if one feels naked humans as pornography then meant that thus automatically that the creator of these humans the largest Pornoproduzent of all times is…
Sunday, 23 April 2006 16:16
bonifatius: @Karl Murx
It dirt excavator buckets. Otherwise a comment no longer worth.
Sunday, 23 April 2006 15:49
Karl Murx: From the editorship removes
All reader opinions indicate 2 further reader opinions
The editorship does not take responsibility for contents of the contributions. She reserves herself the right to delete contributions as well as to exclude readers from the debate.
Copyright © 2008 kreuz.net