In Germany the catholic day runs. In a greeting Benedikt demanded XVI. the unit of the catholic laymen with the Pope. Its appeal remained obviously unheard.

(, Saarbruecken kreuz.net) yesterday Germany began from `the central committee of the German Katholiken' organized 96 in that. Catholic day. It stands for justice under the slogan „forwards God face “.

Venue is the Saarland capital Saarbruecken. The Spektaktel goes on Sunday to the end.

With the meeting about 40,000 participants are expected. Among them are German Federal President Horst Köhler, Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel, the chairman of the social-democratic party, Kurt Beck, and 900 guests from 53 countries.

From the expected lasting express takers are catholic and 8 per cent protestant according to data of the organizers 91 per cent. Youth to 18 years place the largest group with 22,8 per cent of the participants.

With the opening celebration arranged with Sacro Pop and Pantomime on Wednesday evening read out the Apostoli Nuntius in Germany, archbishop Erwin Josef Ender, a greeting of Pope Benedikt XVI.

To place itself `the central committee of the German Katholiken' - to which the Pope had still accused as Kurienkardinal, as kind Gegenlehramt „less against the bishops than against the teaching profession of the Pope “- a papal video message had expected.

In its greeting Benedikt reminded XVI. urgently to the unit of the catholic laymen with the Pope and the bishops. Only like that the certification of the church is reliable.

Further the Pope explained that the civilization of the love had to maintain ground today particularly against a culture of death, which becomes visible in different forms of the Entwürdigung of humans by biomedical instrumentalization starting from the emergence of the life:

„You meets us in the increasing indifference in relation to abortions, in the injury that became the woman and the children. “

The program of the catholic daily contains more than thousand meetings. Are offered lectures, discussions, exhibitions, readings and concerts. There are also numerous services.

In the large number of partially valuable meetings the responsible persons transferred after the usual mixture strategy points of program from the left spectrum, which are completely unacceptable for one catholic day and are steered by church-strange ideologies.

There are meetings, which are occupied with „the eucharistischen meal community of all Christian inside “or with one „fair language “for the Bible.

One point of program publicises openly the woman surgery: „, Katharina is greeted - for the day of the Diakonin. Our time needs a Diakonat of the woman. “

Also propaganda from Homo ideologists receive on the catholic day a forum.

Thus a meeting demands „justice for same sex loving! “. A further asks homosexuals and normal men to the discussion: „Men are alike not all. “

There are also Homo meetings, which foresaw it on the recent generation: „Our children in the middle in it, not outside forwards! Homosexual and their families. “

`A network of catholic lesbians and the working group homosexual and Kirche' load to „the Coming Out in the youth work “. This meeting takes place in a High School.

The disputed Homo union `ecumenical working group homosexual and church - HuK' wants „a putting up instead of arranging “and demands one „fair handling lesbian and gay young person “:

„As taboo topic homosexuality makes young people and parents equally Coming out heavily. Catholic youth work has the requirement to strengthen and support young person. “

With a further meeting the same Homo association under the line of a Jesuitenpaters wants to celebrate „the love - the love bless “.

One would like - as it means - pastorale initiatives to clarify, church borders and possibilities out to mark and new dare.

The costs for the German catholic day are estimated with 6.7 million euros. From it originate 1.25 million euros from means of the Saarland and a equivalent large sum of the host diocese Trier.

`The federation of the Diözesen Deutschlands' contributes one million euros, the German State of 400,000 euros.

Over donations, participant contributions and sponsor funds flow 2.1 million euros into the cashes.

Internaut: been late @abu

(The psychological mainstream you can forget, to that are wrong by an ideological setting the course.)

It is naturally very simple to say that all, which argue differently than one is ideologically dazzled.
Levitikus is not binding for gläubige Christians. that is here in all clarity said.

Me no Christian is well-known, that itself for instance at Lev 11,3; 12,2-6; 18,6-17; 23,6 holds. It is inexpressible that Christians argue just with Lev 18.22!

Abu: @Karl Heinrich Ulrichs

I do not know whether you want to really know that, or whether only a tactics is, here an x times led debate again anzuleiern. Therefore you will have yourselves to be content with a Posting.
As belongs sich's after Biblical view, stands in genesis 2.24 and 1st Korintherbrief 7,2. As does not belong sich's, stands in Levitikus 18,22; 20,13 and becomes in the Roman letter 1,26-27.32-33; 1. Timotheusbrief 1, 9-10 as well as 1st Korintherbrief 6.9 confirms. The word „homosexuality “is not necessary for it, gab's at that time also not yet. But the thing was clear, it from the church fathers to the today's teaching profession interpretation in such a way was understood and will not also change. If you want to know more, go into a library. Contrary to its scientific Getue the Wikipedia article gives neither the position to the church again nor the mainstream of the Exegese. The position that homosexuality is against natural and sündhaft, results im übrigen also from reason reasons. But in addition you would have to be concerned with nature right. (The psychological mainstream you can forget, to that are wrong by an ideological setting the course.)
Hugh.

Refuge Schlämmer: @Karl Heinrich Ulrichs

Say times where is located in the Bible that God homosexuality does not want?? There times the word does not emerge „homosexuality “. Fact is that evenly nothing stands explicitly in it. One knows exactly the same Bible places heranziehn as proofs for it that homosexuality in the contradiction to the church does not stand. Everyone can interpret that as it wants. Or where it says to me free of doubts stands.

Yes, that with the Bible places free of doubts is so a thing. I also always said to my chief instructor the fact that one is not to deliver a bad certification over its next ones because in the Bible is located in such a way. Nevertheless me this old Sünder always issued a bad certification, although it is located differently in the Bible.

They, dear Karl Heinrich, read the Bible probably as as my old chief instructor, very self-willed or as you correctly write: „Everyone can interpret that, how it wants! „It is thus pure will thing, which one recognizes in such a way or also not.

Karl Heinrich Ulrichs †: Where that stands?!

Say times where is located in the Bible that God homosexuality does not want?? There times the word does not emerge „homosexuality “. Fact is that evenly nothing stands explicitly in it. One knows exactly the same Bible places heranziehn as proofs for it that homosexuality in the contradiction to the church does not stand. Everyone can interpret that as it wants.

Or where it says to me free of doubts stands.

expedit: Who selected the central committee?

From whom does this central committee have the democratic authentication?
Or does it concern a church-legally created organization?
Who knows there more? !:)

net_patrol: @cypripedium

I meant: this canned goods really already ran off, off into the bio garbage