Sunday, 16 July 2006 10:45
Londoner scandal stories
The speaker of the British archbishop of Westminster was entangled recently into a bad mud battle. Unfortunately one cannot say that he would be innocent to it.
Cardinal Murphy O'Connor is considered as an advocate of the life right of unborn humans
Cardinal Murphy O'Connor is considered as an advocate of the life right of unborn humans
(, Westminster kreuz.net) Dr. Austen Ivereigh (40) is the director/conductor of the press work of the catholic ore diocese in the British capital London.

The archbishop of London - who carries the official title „for archbishop of Westminster “- Cormac is a cardinal Murphy O'Connor.

The accusation: The press spokesman of the Erzdiözese is to have geschwängert 23jährig in the year 1989 a Konkubine at that time and push afterwards to the abortion.

Appropriate rumors were strewn at the end of of June of the British popular press `DAILY Mail'.

The daily paper appointed itself on in particular the child mother mentioned. This is in the meantime married and mother of two children.

The abortion is to have been accomplished, as the current press spokesman at the University of Oxford - 80 kilometers northwest of London - studied.

In addition its Konkubine at that time maintained forwards `DAILY one Mail', that it the child at that time has to keep and Ivereigh to marry want: „However he explained unmistakably not to support me and not take part in the education of the child. “

With it was brought into a situation, in which it saw the killing of the child as only way out.

Ivereigh was relieved after the act. Already one week later it went out with the next girl.

It also confessed, already before, during a stay in South America, another girl to have geschwängert.

The publicly accused one of gave another version to the best one.

It did not force its Konkubine at that time to the child abortion. The friend geschwängerte in South America is freely invented.

Ivereigh justified itself thereby that he in its student time - when its child was driven off - no practicing catholic had been.

It was nevertheless against the abortion of the child and since that time passionately against the vorgeburtliche child killing used themselves: „That was trauma table an event, which led back me to the church. “

After its study in Oxford Ivereigh joined the Jesuiten, which he left after one year however again.

Later he worked for the left-catholic British weekly paper `The Tablet'. since 2004 stands it in the service of the archbishop of Westminster.

But last year it happened again.

Ivereigh schwängerte again a Mrs., this mark with twins. First it is to have promised the child mother allegedly the wedding, but to have changed its opinion later. Short time after the mother suffered an abortion.

After the version of Ivereigh the relationship was solved in the mutual agreement.

In the meantime the erzbischöfliche Kurie in London mentioned that the cardinal was informed over the abortion and the recent paternity of its press spokesman:

„Cardinal Murphy O'Connor regards these circumstances as personal and painful for all involved ones. “

The article in `the DAILY Mail' is not without political background.

At this moment the archbishop fights of Westminster for an expansion of the life right of unborn humans. To it also its press spokesman is involved in foremost front.

Whereupon also its youth friend seemed to allude from the 80's, when she explained forwards `DAILY Mail' that Ivereighs was heuchlerisch employment against the abortion in view of this past „“.
6 reader opinions:
Monday, 17 July 2006 00:08
PegasusNbW: @monachus anglicanus
In principle I agree fully. I give to consider however that one means nowadays mostly Greater London, if one speaks of „London “(one means only the town center OF London says one this explicitly; that is at least the experience, which I made during my guest term in England) - and in Greater London (thus „London “in the landläufigen sense) are evenly the two metropolitan seats down mentioned.
Sunday, 16 July 2006 19:04
monachus anglicanus: Westminster not equal London
Thus, Westerminster like each Britisher knows is its own city and not part of the city London. The archbishop, that its seat in Westminster has is called actually archbishop of Westminster and not of London. Southwark is also a town center southern the Themse and has its own archbishop. The town center OF London is only another city within the ore diocese Westminster.
Greetings to all from England.
Sunday, 16 July 2006 17:17
PegasusNbW: Wrong simplification
Actually the writers, that publish on a catholic Internet site, should know that the simplification to bezeichen the archbishop of Westminster as the archbishop from London to are wrong. London has two Roman-catholic Metropoliten nevertheless possesses - the archbishop of Westminster and the archbishop of Southwark.
Sunday, 16 July 2006 17:09
Evelin: If a man to its
Woman/friend says that he will not take part surely in the education of the child and also no money has etc. then can a desperate woman on the idea of the abortion bring. Likewise a typical idiom like „Mach, which you want. It is your decision. Per Choice. “
There is very probably an indirect partial responsibility.

He can say: Yes, that was like that. It is right. It was before my Bekehrung. And this sin does today still suffering to me.
(And not like that a Herumgedruckse).
Sunday, 16 July 2006 13:54
Sulpicius: Here there is also a photo…
Sunday, 16 July 2006 11:38
Beobachterin: quod erat demonstrandum
This article shows that the reality is often different than the theory.

That means in addition, not that each human weakness must be raised to the standard and that this man must become now an abortion proponent.
The editorship does not take responsibility for contents of the contributions. She reserves herself the right to delete contributions as well as to exclude readers from the debate.
Copyright © 2009 kreuz.net