To 21. March 1947 came it in the context of an euthanasia process to the legendary judgement of the higher regional court Frankfurt. It is today well-known as the Hadamar judgement. Excerpt of the text.

(kreuz.net) there is a right standing over the laws, which as last yardstick all formal laws must serve.

It is the nature right, which draws indispensable and last borders to the human legislation.

There is a right standing over the laws, which as last yardstick all formal laws must serve. It is the nature right, which draws indispensable and last borders to the human legislation.

It gives last right sets, which so deep in nature embodied are that everything that as right and law, moral and custom are to be considered has to align itself in the latter after this nature right, this right standing over the laws.

If a law offends here and if it injures the eternal standards of the nature right, then this law of its contents is to be equated because of no more with the right.

It does not only lack the obligating Kraft for the citizen, but it is invalid at law and may not be obeyed by it.

Its injustice content is then so substantial that it would never arrive at the right can, although the legislator dressed this contents into the outwardly valid form of a law.

One these in nature deeply and inseparably rooted right sets is the sentence of the holyness of the human life and the right of humans to this life.


Hadamar judgement Frankfurt higher regional courts during the euthanasia process of 21. March 1947, file reference: 4 Kls 747.

esistkrieg †: From the editorship removes

DDL: Oh, „the mute cry of “this strange Dr. Nathanson…

I am again and again surprised, with which devotion gläubige catholics hang on the lips of a man, who drove his own partner a witnessed off a child by it - a Geanke, which gives most per choice'lern „the creeps “, for probably not explanation-needy, ethical reasons.

It seems to be with its getürkten story of „the mute cry “a klitzekleines little in the less opinion:

„The Kleinhirn achieves its final form in the 7th month. The casing (Myelinisierung) of the Rückenmarks and the brain begins 40 between the 20. and. Pregnancy week. These and other developments of the nervous system must have taken place, before the foetus pain can feel “(explanation of the combination of the American gynecologists).

If we speak of the development of the brain, however perhaps shouldn't we support by the statements of someone, which specialized in the development of the brain, mean ourselves you?

„Before the 26. Week is not functional the brain cortex. Therefore it is in any case unfounded, of a “perception” or a “conscious reaction” of the foetus to speak “.
(Maria Fitzgerald, Professor for neuro biology, London)

There tree ELT then of me made of still so manufacturer a Trigeminus (I hab' that not `times examined, there inconsequentially) and has so no functional brain, to which it could announce any attractions. Sowas in addition,…

franco.felice: Godwin's Law's a one-way street? Or… „who does not want to learn from history,…

In reality, the weight of the crime, which nearly world-wide one practices, this law a further arm of the Maulkorbparagrafen 130 StGB is suitable. Is only missing state security service, NKWD, to take over etc. around the informer work.

Most readers saw films like „the mute cry “. Them thus also „experts cannot fool to “anything, who say, which begins human lives punctually at expiration of 90 days and before is the unborn only one cell heap and one can speak only at expiration of this term of human life.

But which happens, what feels the unborn with the abortion?

The Abtreiber (!!) injects a salt solution. The child drinks it with the fruit water, and internally and outwardly is burned. This cruel method torments the child several hours to death enters. If the Betäubung does not work correctly, „the mother feels “even, how the child steps in the death struggle around itself.

In all other respects: Already after 4 weeks among other things the Nervus exists trigeminus. The child can then already feel pain. By ultrasonic even pulse accelerations can on 200 the high-fast be proven with the unborn one, if - bspw. with abortion over Caesarian - which is by force opened mother body.

But which cares that the bad ones, which gave it at all times…

DDL: @franco

Ah, „so one like me “- you know nothing from me, but that you tear me up „in air “köönten, there you are safe itself. Well finely, such stout sayings have here boom - it would remain clarifying still why you and their do not tear gevattern it then simply to DOING up, this „in air “, with all us „per choice “- Schuften? As far as I know, there is the §§218ff still, thus either is not whole your tearing up qualities then, as you maintain that, or surprisingly in the last weeks unfolded them ingenious and will reach in the next days the legislator.

If you mean the fact that I make myself merry over your Hybris has you probably right.

To her holy Dr. Nathanson there are by the way also completely interesting articles - nicely also that he would openly approve a murder at a living person in favor of an unborn one. Jaja, the moral of the moralists of own grace…

Jörg Guttenberger, Cologne: antihomoLobby, francofelice

A.: there are no driving off women, but only driving off mothers. The speech of driving off women leads to an irrelevant minimization.

f.: humans, who know themselves before God responsible, do not become completely reliably murders.

Abortion falls at least after German criminal law not under murder, but is separate a facts constituting an offence regular in the penal code. We should consider this circumstances, so that each right connoisseur accuses us for minimization faculty of judgement not lacking. JPII spoke applicable of a abhor-worthy crime, and we should use this Beriff. In the thing I agree you to the full extent.

Maurice Corvisier: @ dämo

Serious dispute, with you?

In this forum in the meantime sufficient people experienced, what them by a serious dispute to understand.

Sky, Toussaint, how often am I you still the fast, but unbelievably applicable analysis of my cousin around the ears to strike?

There is a way to come out from your involving. That is called: Realization, regret, reversal. With your intelligence (even if that for the moment, for the moment! in your language is counter productive) could you that. Free yourselves!

Their relationship with the girl could win then also a quality, which corresponds to both. _ above all it. (, You do not take request badly it my friend in Bischofsheim.). But such a quality must you, as which by far older, aim at. There they are in a responsibility, if you are a man. A man. And not someone, of the…

poenitentiam age.

I did so far nothing to be allowed to request you to look up „poenitentiam age “for itself. In your interest however: do it!! If necessary despite me. Or in order to strike it to me around the ears.

He, Toussaint, you are now demanded! As M A N N!

And if you can read that in peace, see easy: that is not a provocation, but a cry. Around it. Around it and the girl. I C h is completely uninteresting thereby.

I am Moritz.