Monday, 17 July 2006 13:30
The hoped for fruits were missing
The Gottesdienstkongregation keeps innumerable complaints daily over liturgical bad states and idle bishops: „The people go last to the old persons fair and our churches empty. “
Second Vatikani council (1962-1965)
Second Vatikani council (1962-1965)
(, Rome kreuz.net) on Thursday the secretary of the Kongregation for the service and the Sakramentenordnung - archbishop Albert Malcom Ranjith Patabendige Don - granted `I Media' an interview to the French press agency.

The archbishop disclaimed at the end of of June before the French daily paper `La Croix' to have said that the Liturgiereform had never taken off:

The srilankesische Prälat Ranjith
The srilankesische Prälat Ranjith
„I did not say that in such a way, and it is not true. “

The use of the national language is something positive. Now everyone can understand, what happens on the altar or with the readings. The same is valid for the sense of community, which developed.

Sometimes however these elements were overemphasized a little. Thus certain positive aspects of the church tradition were lost.

Archbishop Ranjith explains that the Pope in his preface to the book `Conversi ad Dominum: To history and theology of the Christian Gebetsrichtung' it stressed that the people altar and giving up latin are not part of the second Vatikanums.

One can say neither that everything well, nor that everything ran badly - so the archbishop salomonisch: „The reforms of the council have, as them converted, not the hoped for fruits were carried. “

Today give it two extremes to avoid.

To permit „each priest or bishop that it makes, what it wants and in such a way confusion creates.

Or on the contrary: To give up the idea of an adjustment to the modern context completely and include themselves in the past. “

The Pope knows over the present situation very exactly. He think over the problem and over possibilities of overcoming it.

Archbishop Ranjith explained in the interview that the Gottesdienstkongregation receives each day innumerable letters.

The believers deplored themselves over many bad states: „Priests, who make, what it want. Bishops, who lock their eyes or which bad states in the name of the” renewal “even justified. “

„At the end the people to the tridentinischen fair and our churches go empty. “The old person fair does not belong to the Lefebvristen nevertheless.

It is to be stopped at the time with the confrontations.

One must examine at the same time whether the liturgical was faithful in relation to development the Liturgiekonstitution of the second Vatikanums `Sacrosanctum Concilium'.
All reader opinions indicate 6 of 30 reader opinions:
Thursday, 20 July 2006 11:11
Aurelius: @ mariokin
But you dare it to call this group sect!

Yes. And?

Supporters of these „group “are not also squeamish, if it concerns to spread their anti-Roman table reserved for regulars slogans here.
Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:58
Artois †: @stat crux
I do not have anything against liberals, state only that they do not belong to the church. This tolerance I take the liberty.
Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:18
mariokin: @Aurelius
But you dare it to call this group sect!
Wednesday, 19 July 2006 14:07
Aurelius: @ mariokin
Never the Apostoli chair in the case of the Piusbruderschaft spoke sect of one „“.

I did not also state that the Apostoli chair in the case of the FSSPX of one „sect spoke “.
Tuesday, 18 July 2006 19:58
Cardinal Mazzella: statcrux - Dr. Otterbeck
I am not for you me hold, however once its lecture over the outrage read, which was very convincing. Outrage an act is called, which is committed from measuringness. Want you about to deny that Johannes XXIII, Paul VI and Johannes Paul II several times measuringness to have shown. I know their answer already in advance. They will make valid that they could not differently. Naturally they could not differently however with such a unkatholischen convicition
Tuesday, 18 July 2006 19:52
stat crux: Artois:
They are thus kathoisch?

Does L already fall under liberalism suspicion?
All reader opinions indicate 24 further reader opinions
The editorship does not take responsibility for contents of the contributions. She reserves herself the right to delete contributions as well as to exclude readers from the debate.
Copyright © 2009 kreuz.net