Thursday, 20 July 2006 13:22
On 26 priests 22 Novizen and student come
That a medal community does not have to be necessarily a kind Christian home for the elderly, proved a young Kongregation recently. In Austria.
House chapel in the mother house of the SJM - lock Auhof - in blind market
House chapel in the mother house of the SJM - lock Auhof - in blind market
(, blind market kreuz.net) to 12. /13. July 2006 found the second tidy general chapter of the Kongregation of the servants Jesu and Mariens - Servi Jesu et Mariae - instead of.

Venue was the small lock Auhof in the down-Austrian locality blind market. The market municipality belonged to the Diözese pc. Pölten and is appropriate 50 kilometers west for the bishop city.

The lock Auhof is the mother house of the Kongregation. It serves for also to the Noviziat and in-house theological training of the scholastics.

The community was begun in the year 1988 by a former Jesuiten and Pfadfinderkaplan - Pater Andreas Hönisch -. She sees herself as reestablishment of the Jesuitenordens.

The Kongregation of the Servi Jesu et MariaeThe Kongregation of the Servi Jesu et Mariaeclicking you on the picture, in order to start the photo mile with 8 pictures.

1994 received the servants Jesu and Mariens from the papal commission Ecclesia Dei the acknowledgment as Kongregation of papal right.

For the cause of the general chapter all members of the Kongregation were present. This consists in the meantime of 26 priests and 22 Novizen and scholastics.

The fields of work of the priests are various. Members of the servants Jesu and Mariens care for Pfarreien and are active in Germany and Austria in the youth work and in the Schriftenapostolat.

In Münsterland leads the medal in the house Assen a boarding school for boys.

Outside of the German linguistic area priests of the Kongregation are active in Romania, where they care for a kindergarten, a school and a home for the elderly.

In Kazakhstan priests of the servants Jesu and Mariens lead a central school complex with 200 children and young people and care for remote mission stations.

Finally the medal is active in the Resozialisierung of young people in France.

The general chapter advised over important questions of the Kongregation and again selected Pater Andreas Hönisch to the general-upper.
All reader opinions indicate 6 of 51 reader opinions:
Monday, 24 July 2006 10:46
Bernado: Apokryphen
Otterbeck wrote: „Who is „more apokrypher “? The Thomas gospel or Drewerman?

One must differentiate and can here. There are Apokryphen, which completely on the basis of the Christian faith. In addition belong many earlyChristian excessive quantities and narrations, which unfounded-proves irgendwannn once younger Jesu to Apostel or another was attributed and thus occasionally than holy writing were valid.

As far as that was promptly recognized, one excluded these texts with the final determination of the canon evenly again. They are valuable historical sources, but they do not belong to the corpus of the writings, which resulted under inspiration from the spirit of God.

Then there are writings however since oldest time also, in which Christian thought fragments arise mixed with Jewish or heidnischen or other theories - if one so wants thus häretische writings. The so-called Thomas gospel belongs into this row. In addition, it is gnostisch after its basic adjustment, contains Christian pieces of disalignment and some probably genuine Jesusworte, the saying collections of Christian municipalities developed out early taken over its dürftehn.

To that extent one can quite place Thomas gospel and Drevermann into a row.
Monday, 24 July 2006 10:33
stat crux: By the way:
Scheffczyks thought of the absence of any Marienreliquien is valid all the more for Jesus for themselves (without consideration for the question about the Sindone respectable Manopello).
Monday, 24 July 2006 10:08
Dr. Otterbeck: Why also not?
One should include some Apokryphen calmly, under Voirbehalt certainly. Anyhow the reservation does not have to fail than in relation to exegetischer literature (= 7/8 rubbish) the present more intensively.
Who is „more apokrypher “? The Thomas gospel or Drewerman?
Monday, 24 July 2006 01:01
Benedikt: @ DDL
… that the apokryphen writings whenever it comes inconveniently, which is pure devil things, which did not find „for good reason “in „the divine inspired “canon entrance that one gets her if necessary and to other argument poverty gladly from the crate, in order to occupy any „old traditions “?

The Apokryphen served always as source, only evenly not at full extent like a gospel the Bible recognition. Thus for over 1200 years the Hl e.g. admires the churches. Anna, Mutter Mariens. Their name dips only into the Apokryphen on…
Saturday, 22 July 2006 21:29
Maurice Corvisier: @ baby lone
Deschner is therefore a Höllenaspirant (that is not a final condemnation, stands only for the boss too), because he as many poor souls as her confused and enticed.

Which at the words quoted by you also only in the beginning should be beautiful, remains someone secret, which resides completely, completely right at the bottom: the secret of the fly God.

Converte!
Saturday, 22 July 2006 21:13
Babylon †: From me
can you believe, what you want.
Deschner: “Me their faith is schnuppe, schnurzpiepe. They can believe, they can what want, be chopped off the head for it… “

Because it is not obviously the will to believe this whole rubbish a real conviction.

Must be hard for you. No miracle that your Deschner hates. I enjoy simply about the clearing-up. Pure end in itself for me.

Deschner has all right: „, Superficial, then walk the Pfaffe, covers one its background, his imbecility on… nevertheless whatever God unkt and hums… - it lets me colder than each Winseln of a dog, to each bird sound. “

With these beautiful words - I think - I let it be good with this topic.
All reader opinions indicate 45 further reader opinions
The editorship does not take responsibility for contents of the contributions. She reserves herself the right to delete contributions as well as to exclude readers from the debate.
Copyright © 2009 kreuz.net