Today nearly everything is possible in national schools. But if a Muslim headscarf comes along, one becomes suddenly sensitive.

(, Stuttgart kreuz.net) Stuttgart Administrative Courts in the so-called head cloth controversy the written grounds submitted.

The reported `the Frankfurt general Zeitung' yesterday Wednesday.

Preceding the court of a GermanMuslim teacher permitted head cloth stretchers in instruction.

Critics of the judgement had stated that the Islamic headscarf did not only have a religious meaning, but also for a political message stand.

Against it the grounds explain that the complaining teacher does not want to obtain a political message after convincing statements with her headscarf.

The judges are the view that head cloth stretchers and the Nonnentracht in the school service are to be treated that directly.

The judges that the declaration contained in the head coverage carried by „the plaintiff is suitable “, affirm „the neutrality of the country opposite pupils and parents or the political to endanger or disturb religious or world-descriptive school peace “.

The school law of Baden-Wuerttemberg forbids both religious as well as political declarations.

The judges therefore consider it permissible to designate also abstract endangerments of the school neutrality and them prevent.

In the grounds it is even entitled that the constant confrontation with such an headscarf in instruction has also another quality than the bare knowledge around the Islamic faith affiliation of a teacher.

The plaintiff cannot appoint herself therefore with success to that it never gave difficulties at its school because of the headscarf. Also it cannot state, their religion is well-known, so that the ban of the Islamic veil causes nothing more.

Because the regional legislator is in the school law around the avoidance of abstract dangers, which went out of carrying the headscarf.

But then the court states that the administrative practice of the country against the equal treatment requirement offence, if at a national primary school in Baden-Baden nuns in its Ordenshabit general screen end subjects informed.

The Nonnenhabit is - just like the Islamic headscarf or the Jewish Kippa - expression of a religious confession.

While the regional legislator wants to create a granting privilege of Christian and Jewish confession characters, the school law in the sense of strict equal treatment of the religious communities must be laid out.

Of Tübingen constitutionalist Ferdinand Kirchhof the assigned the process agency of the country it believes that the Administrative Court with this argumentation the intention of the legislator konterkariere.

Kirchhof will insert a complaint around it with the Administrative Court Stuttgart against the nonadmission of the appointment.

If one allows to these, the administrative court of Baden-Wuerttemberg Mannheim is to be called as next instance.

Earlier constitutional court judge seriousness Wolfgang Böckenförde considers meanwhile the strict equal treatment of all religious communities essential.

In order not to smooth the way into the Laizität, which would accompany with a displacement of the religion in the private, Böckenförde considers head cloth stretchers of a Muslim teacher possible, if she connects with it no Indoktrination.

Aldo Carigiet: Kippa, headscarf and Nonnenhabit under a hat?

Doesn't one draw in the priest clothes (- habit) does why, which in manigfacher execution from the Missionar to the cardinal is present, not into this so-called controversy also?
Why is an headscarf to be comparable with the Kippa?
Is the headscarf comparable with the Nonnenhabit?
Who comes on such muck? Are those actual illiterates or judges?
I do not understand the world any longer that there are so stupid persons, who can state sowas!
Wouldn't a Katechetikkurs do to these people well?
Shouldn't immigrants adapt in principle to the customs of the host country?

Or are we actually so far that, which lives in „its “homeland and would like to remain must adapt and bend to the immigrants?
Isn't that a very dangerous development?

Quo Vadis Christian West?
Quo Vadis, dear citizen, if you you the others, which minorities, which must adapt right of hospitality-injuring,…?

How much longer?
Why? Why? Why?

Don't I have no more rights, only the new to Züger in my own country?
Where and how do I find the homeland?

MK28: The circuit malfunctionings of the most miserable Sünders

That Medjugorje younger E.S. is really quaint:

Which at my statement „and this council is as event evenly openly anti-catholic, it denies in its practice and in itself theology developing from it almost the entire depositum fidei. “wrongly is not white, I; I talk of the event and of practice, not of the text. The same with the measuring quotation: That the fair can be valid, it however in praximeist not is, corresponds to steady FSSPX opinion. Why thus don't my circuits function?

The hit comes however:
aufklärerischer requests, like the European agreement,

The European idea as aufklärerisches request; not badly! Do you consider the nation states probable then also well catholic, or? Man, you are only dä…

national influencing control on school

consider a national school supervision I idT meaningful.

and family,

did I never demand, but, what of target?

Islamophobie in connection with kriegshetzterischen slogans

As said, you read times the call of Pope urban one II to the 1st crusade on the council of Clermont 1095: The temple of the gentleman,… is now seat of the devil nascent… Arm you with the eagerness of God, dear brothers, gürtet your swords to your sides, prepare you and are sons of the enormous one! It is better to die in the fight to see suffering than our people and the holy ones.

So far urban one II, the old reconnaissance aircraft!
But which shears a most miserable Sünder the truth, it has nevertheless its bornierten prejudices.

Jörg Guttenberger, Cologne: Headscarf - Ordenstracht

The view, the Ordenstracht of Christian klösterlicher communities and the headscarf of the Muslims are equally expression of religious confessions, are directly wrong!

As well known Ordenstrachten and priest clothes are carried exclusively of the appropriate occupational groups, similarly clothes of soldiers, policemen, post office and railway officials, caretaker smock and urban garbage disposal. It thus exclusively acts around working clothes.

The headscarf however is to be carried of all Muslim women and is only thereby an indication of religious affiliation.

During consistent observance of the judgement from there no policeman in uniform might enter the property of an urban school more, and the caretaker has gefälligst no more smock to carry to arise but in Schlipps and Kragern! Joke?

Most miserable Sünder: With MK28

it acts around a mole.

It gives itself traditionalistisch catholic, divides however with each offering opportunity blows against the church out („V2 “, „JP2 “and „B16 “would be häretisch „“).

Although it arises otherwise approximately „to conspiracy theories “so remarkably aggressively, it presumes to the damage of the church to the following statement; „And this council as event is evenly openly anti-catholic, it denies itself in its practice and in theology developing from it almost the entire depositum fidei. “

Its large request is publicising aufklärerischer requests, like the European agreement, national influencing control on school and family, Islamophobie in connection with kriegshetzterischen slogans, like „each Zurückweichen strengthens the Militanz “etc.

Sometimes it comes into MK28s Oberstübchen also to merry Schaltkreisfehlfuntkionen of the following kind:

06. February 2006 15:46
I did not deny the validity of the new fair; it can be valid, whereby I in view of the education and faith conditions mi admitted priests of am convinced that she is invalid idR.

Benedikt: @ Babylon

The criteria are fixed in a Gestz or the like. Otherwise a court could not have decided on it.

And the laws are issued of the legislator, therefore shortens expressed of the state. Therefore it can prefer thus religions.

The head cloth judgement has - as I already said - hereby nothing to do, since it is a question of the worship. I wanted to only say - so the starting point of this discussion - something to the contribution of timpressum, which stated, the state must all equal religions treat.

Babylon †: @ Benedikt: Ehrkich said: No.

The criteria are fixed in a Gestz or the like. Otherwise a court could not have decided on it.

The witnesses Jehovas got right nevertheless.

Thus on which do you want outside? That the State of traditional religious communities prefers? - Obvious not.