In the hate against the lion from Münster are itself socialists and National Socialists united. But there is a reason. By Hubert Hecker.

(kreuz.net) on 26 June 2006 `the Frankfurt Allgemeine' published an article of Rudolf will-borrows under the title „Hitler's willing executors? “.

The author uncovered therein cheap slanders, which were spoken for example of the set off Theologin Ute climb Heinemann against the lion of Münster, August cardinal of galas.

After the publication of the article Mrs climbing appeared few in a reader letter to `the Frankfurt Allgemeine' despite clear fact situation learn ready.

In the meantime still another further group howled, which by the appropriate historical analysis of the article from will-borrow in trouble one got.

The group, which calls itself `initiative of free Christians for the Christ of the Bergpredigt', slandered the cardinal in the past in a publication, which calls itself `peace Zeitung' and had placed their side also in the Internet.

The produced quotation was likewise used, whose also Mrs climbing had availed herself, in order to put cardinal of galas as alleged Englandhasser and warmongers.

The appropriate article under the heading: „Blessed speaking of a warmonger “contained also the reference that the bishop had been in recent years an enthusiastic hunter and concluded from it:

„Who has desire at killing animals, finds also nothing to let soldiers for `the Endsieg' use for heating. “

This attack evaluated will-borrow in his article in `the Frankfurt Allgemeinen' as „the deepest level “.

As Mrs climbing did not let `the Initiative' this entitled criticism already before sit also on itself. In a reader letter in `the Frankfurt Allgemeinen' from 6 July it countered with a Tolstoi quotation: „From the animal murder to the people murder only one step is and concomitantly from the cruelty to animals to the Menschenquälerei. “

This verqueren animal people theory the world view of the doubtful animal protection philosopher Peter Singer, that fits the cause its 60. Birthday in the same expenditure for newspaper one introduced.

This disputed philosopher uses his philosophy of the smoothing-out of the difference between animal and humans however in another sense than the Tolstoi Christians.

Who eats meat and so that approving of accepts the killing of house and game animals, also the killing of unborn and born infants may after Singer as well as did not mentally handicapped children to condemn.

Singers ethical criteria for the killing of organisms are the current in each case abilities and characteristics of an individual and not their affiliation to the kind humans or animal.

„With each fair comparison of morally relevant characteristics such as rationality, self-confidence, consciousness, autonomy, desire and pain sensation and so on have the calf, the pig and the much lampooned chicken a good lead over a human foetus. “

Also the born infant as well as a handicapped child are less `Person' than a grown-up domestic animal - Singer believes:

In a society, in which forms of the life developed far are killed for human consuming, the child abortion is not to be condemned for superficial reasons and with advanced pregnancy.

Singer dissolves thereby the fundamental right on equality and equal treatment of humans in each development phase and each life condition.

That is a threatening philosophy, which opens a further can of the Pandora. But the progressive representatives of our society need today such wrong prophets, in order to legitimize mass killing to justify the killing of handicapped infants and old humans planned from unborn children to and.

This philosophical Verbrämung of the right of the stronger one stands in the irreconcilable contrast to the Christian idea of man of the blessed cardinal of galas.

This was naturally committed to the thought as young man and hunters that animals may not be tormented, but to be preserved is and carefully to treat is.

But only humans an absolute life protection and an inviolable come became too due to its God even figurativeness.

Therefore bishop expressed itself von Galen - like all German bishops of its time strictly against the National Socialist abortion law of 1935 and in his three famous lectures from July/August 1941 against the killing of patients and obstructed by the National Socialist bandits fought.

On this background abruptly a light comes up, why the various slanders of the blessed cardinal particularly to left and progressive circles is so greedily taken up:

The historical Vorkämpfer for life protection and life right is also a prosecutor against today's killing practice and against large killing plans.

Therefore thus the lion is to be dismantled and denunziert by Münster.

Jörg Guttenberger, Cologne: Parzifal, deusexmachina

P.: Please, you remain material! Reference to a protokollarische decision of the Viennese of congress does not mean any valuation of its political decisions. Thus it does not require a bridge impact to the democratic constitutional state.

D.: The council called, confirming thoughts of partial hard de Chardin, the entire creation holy. Exkrementen this characteristic to award, means a completely substantial exaggeration. By exaggeration is conductible each still so reasonable thoughts ad absurdum.

Its statement reference Jerusalem applies. Holyness means emphasis, but normality after understanding at that time not! Since this term is understood today indeed as increased height, one uses it only very hesitant and comes to meet thereby your conceptions. To me it concerned only to make the obviously not understood thoughts Galens in an appropriate general context understandable.

Hl. röm. To richly I excluded completely consciously deuscher nation, because it exhibits the usual problems, which are connected with a transmission of worldly force at religious officials: one feels, one out our all experience understandable comfort following, increasing more the Materielen, than obligated to suffocate the church threatens the clergyman in the stranglehold of worldly force because church posts as deposit places for later born, nicnt aristocrat entitled to inherit served, their geisltliche Intgeressen often more, as if were limited.

aschera: Old box, identically to a Schlampe… you have sugar snail, something against me?

Thus, once to clarification:
I find your letting in already a little annoying to my person. That is virtual Stalking, if they ask me.
Why I should use piefke word anbaggern, still for it where it in direct proximity for the term excavator lake a repetition of word would be.
After their Postings I misunderstood obviously however with the term excavator lake anyway somewhat!
Their strategy to draw each contentwise statement meinerseits by it to Zuckerschneckengesülze in the ridiculous will not too often come up.
Which aphrodite concerns not to suspend apart from an easy surplus of verbal accuracy has I much at their positions. For a personnel union with aphrodite I am however not to be had!

23er Hansl: @ Jawohl!:

Them one must wash times the mouth with soap, you Damenbeleidiger, you!

Jawohl!: Laughter cramp

O-clay/tone aphrodite: The nature right is a postulate of conservative, totalitaristischer and paternalistischer ethics theory.



HP: It asks itself only whether the Schlampe” Aphrodite “is identical with the sweet sugar snail” Aschera “from that Reli process card.

Ansgar: @ aphrodite

Times apart from the fact that it - unfortunately! - no innumerable of Galens in church history gave:

What do you mean with your letting in?

aphrodite †: …

Finally the church survived already 2000 years.
But not because of, but despite the innumerable of Galens.