Friday, 4 August 2006 18:17
Is the European Union adaptive?
Single fighters will be able to align against the organized Politverbrecher of the present little. Of Günter Annen.
With the embryonic stem cell research infants are produced, expenditure-feasted and violated their corpse parts for people attempts.
With the embryonic stem cell research infants are produced, expenditure-feasted and violated their corpse parts for people attempts.
(kreuz.net) on 24 July the Council of the European Union in Brussels co-ordinated.

Thereby one decided to permit and financially promote research at infants - so-called embryos -.

Thus now European-wide the gates are open to killing of humans.

I cannot understand that 61 years after Auschwitz the next killing machinery without large resistance can start - as if nothing would have happened.

At that time the allied ones freed us of the criminals of the third realm. Today they slip - after appropriate European Union laws were made - into the same role.

They force in this way also still different EU member to go through and co-finance in contempting for human beings research programs.

The criminal Adolf Hitler could learn today of our politicians a quantity, like „one it makes better “. We today actually live in a Unkultur of death.

„The initiative never again! “requests all groups of life rights in Europe to finally interlace themselves and to start together effective actions.

Single fighters will be able to align against these organized criminals of the present little.


Günter Annen from Weinheim is never Lebensrechtler, publisher of the messages of European citizens' initiatives `Wieder' and uses itself for the protection of the life and.
All reader opinions indicate 6 of 15 reader opinions:
Saturday, 5 August 2006 17:03
möchtegern kathole: @Bernardin (murder and killing)
generally with that the two terms and still few more (homicide) different things one marks. The difference lies e.g. in the motive, or in the resolution and/or the missing resolution. With the abortion is valid however:
* it is nearly always a resolution given
* someone defenseless um's life comes
* it comes someone um's lives, which is entrusted to the author
* with the motive there is a certain spectrum. Generally however rather low motives might be present, about that the child makes work, or 1 child rich, or which period of life partner does not like the child, or that the 60qm for 2 people would be already quite little, or the child is handicapped and must therefore away.

Everyone can write however gladly „killing “.
Saturday, 5 August 2006 01:23
first of all abortion was posed under heavy punishment under the national socialist.

That is partial truth and thus at the same time also a partial lie.

The National Socialists have even obligation aborts would drive through leave. With Sinti and Romafrauen for example, whose counted new generation, as it to „the lebensunwerten life “.

An abort was punished then only if one let reinrassige, Nordic Arierin “it make „.
Saturday, 5 August 2006 00:42
God hard: several times
BTW: the CDU is none interprets better and required at present not times an armistice in the Middle East, which is to be equated with request (and/or tolerance/acceptance) to the further mass murder.

and it requires also no armistice in Sri Lanka!
Saturday, 5 August 2006 00:03
Jawohl!: Forward!
I am for six years in the SPD. In this time we have there nothing at all such decided…

The point is nevertheless of the: The question of the protection of unborn babies at present really does not separate the parties. (Naturally there are differences in the verbal one, given. Then you must make clear in addition, that the FDP denies still more radically the life right of unborn babies, as SPD and the Greens to use around this Verallgemeinerung at all once.)

From this it follows however nevertheless that one must position its political commitment party-political according to other criteria.

One is clear thereby: All my” fellow party members “in the OV know around my view.
Friday, 4 August 2006 23:52
Bernardin †: Like gladly
Is there a difference between murder and killing?
Friday, 4 August 2006 23:47
möchtegern kathole: it must already still…
… permitted its to castigate the abortion as murder to say and clearly zund clearly that it was introduced with the voices of the SPD (and FDP) into Germany.

Who abstreitet, not completely brightens in the pear, finally can he is that easily reread. Also SPDler learned a reading at school.

BTW: the CDU is none interprets better and required at present not times an armistice in the Middle East, which is to be equated with request (and/or tolerance/acceptance) to the further mass murder.
All reader opinions indicate 9 further reader opinions
The editorship does not take responsibility for contents of the contributions. She reserves herself the right to delete contributions as well as to exclude readers from the debate.
Copyright © 2009 kreuz.net