Why is Homo theideology in the advance? Because a small Homo lobby is today able to stir a public climate up from threat and Denunziation to. A comment.

(kreuz.net) for a long time Homo propagandists in the media, educational facilities and on different levels of the national administration work, in order to take influence there.

The US-American marketer Paul E. Rondeau examined the public strategies of more differently homo ideological groups of lobbies of the USA in this connection.

It published its results 2002 in the essay „like homosexuality in the USA is marketed. “

The cord sample of the Homo propagandists is always the same.

Homosexual behavior is to be put as something positive. Homosexuals are presented suppressed minority, which their interests of group represent as fight for human rights as pleasant.

The criticism at the Homo ideology is branded against it as hate speech, „Homophobie “, ignorance and intolerance, prejudice and discrimination.

One puts this tactics in the public as clearing-up or as human right campaign.

Professor Rondeau brings to it a shaking example from the US medium scene.

The radio host and Therapeutin Dr. Laura Schlessinger (59) are well-known in the United States for their radio show, in which she answers questions to family and sexualness.

It represented long years thereby also precarious pro Homo opinions.

But with their temporary crossing to the conservative and later orthodox Judentum it began at 1996 to speak critical objections and thoughts on the sodomistischen behavior.

Since the year 2000 Mrs. Schlessinger moderated a talc show also in a large TV-transmitter.

That called the radical Homo lobby on the plan.

„Dr. Laura Watch “- monitor program was launched. Each word of the host was examined and each critical statement as „anti- gay “was denounced.

Homo ideologists furnished one „to StopDrLaura.com “- web page. The media were fed accordingly. The web page contained the request to cover for radio and television stations - which the show of Mrs. Schlessinger radiated - with protests.

Additionally daily all companies, which switched advertisements in the range of the Dr.Laura show, were set on an internal message list. One published the telephone numbers of the sponsors as well as left to their companies.

The result was long in coming not.

The listener and spectator evaluations became more badly, the ratio lower. The transmission times were shortened and moved, because the incomes from advertising sank continuously.

After three years campaign and encircling rubbing from the extremist Homo corner Dr. Laura talk show was adjusted.

It always gave a medial fight of the groups of interests for influencing control and opinion power in the pluralistischen community.

But the form was in principle positive nature: We are better, reliable, tolerant, multicolored, formed etc.

The Homo lobby drives against it a double strategy. A positive self-manifestation is combined with a planned and purposeful defaming of all critical voices.

This double strategy practice Homo fighters also isolated.

A Diskutant on `kreuz.net' with the reader name `Ruediger Keller' argues in its forum contributions for tolerance and acceptance in the sense of the Homo ideologists. The homosexuals are generally decent humans and good taxpayers.

But in a German Homo forum same `Ruediger Keller' mobilizes author, who would spread allegedly „lampoons and rushing slogans against homosexuals “against a kreuz.net -.

„Whether it wants to hush up… and it thereby? “`Ruediger Keller' asks thereby ambiguously.

It points out that this author teacher is and would be of from there „it times interesting to experience, what it relative the topic so its pupils teaches and whether this stands in conformity with the curriculum… “

Subsequently, `Ruediger Keller' requests the members of the Homo forum to after-spy the official activities of the author and in his instruction herumzuschnüffeln.

„Perhaps someone may do also times its opinion to him or its service gentleman kund? “

That is a hardly hidden request to illegal `Stalking'. you becomes obvious, after `Ruediger Keller' - again illegal - publishes the personal data of the author: private address, telephone number, official duties, Internet address of the school.

In such a way threatened author received on it several insulting anonymous Hassan calls from radical Homo ideologists.

Only after protest the guest book entry concerned was deleted by the operator of the Homo web page.

Christian Hüller: Anti-gay hate is wrongly at the place

In the whole argument some might have run inclined.

Perhaps the host should have simply not so highly set the topic, but for more leaving to the day to put have…

For Jesus Christ was obviously not central this topic.

If a hetero at gays and Schwulsein hangs itself up, should „“it itself the center of the gospel concentrate.

Who sows hate, storm will harvest…

Nepos: Personal personally ausmisten…

It is to be seen interesting, as from an affair, which takes place two humans betrifft*, a generalization, which is to serve a whole category here for branding. Is serious journalism?

* (a homosexual, catholic sides regards and a catholic, who looks at himself gay sides)

Bonjour: The Corvisier contributions down

read themselves somehow differently, than the large remainder. There actually several seem to put behind the same account. Which is not further amazing, since the Lorraine is alone from considerable size, let alone still under installation course of the Touraine - which lie finally directly around the corner lie: - >

DDL: Ah, you confirm thus at least already `times again

… the attribute „cowardly “with a so simple either-or-ask. And by the way you ask in vain, because in addition you lied here already too often and too excessively and slandered. It my in Ernst someone except your Claqueuren gives still another Pfifferling on your isolations?

Thus, which is, Moritz? You are `nevertheless times a chap and answer you the question. And you stop unverstanden, suddenly one on „“and herumzuschleimen „anxious “, that are erbärmlich.

Their choice? Or it leave wir's with the fact does that you is quite clear, for a poor transfer picture of itself you let which appear here, and only does not want to admit you, how embarrassingly you would drive yourselves here?

And you hear to entrench gefälligst on itself behind theological or moral potemkinschen villages. They abuse such nevertheless only as cheap covering, you man (more exact: Memme) with „the closed visor “.

Maurice Corvisier: I ask to believe me:

if I could do it, I would protect the poor spirit of the time comrades to dismantle itself as in the preceding contribution again completely. It only concerns to me that one must not be able to be pleased it, if the holiest convictions, if the mental homeland verunstaltet by psychologically caused garbage, for others is badly registered.

It is legitimate, for that, which attacks forceful everything, which faith and Sittenlehre is, psychological reasons for the apology to consult, if other explanations do not seize. That, and nothing else, is here the case.

The psychotische biting reflex, which seizes here again, shows actually only the weight of the problem. And the regret is genuine: it really concerns a heavy case from displacement - that is meant only as an assistance to the realization and thus for the solution of the problem.

DDL: They did not answer the question

What are you thus? A bad-willing slanderer and a verlogenes Schandmaul (if you assume that your wild speculations do not apply nevertheless)?

Or a run down character, which does not back-frighten to abuse serious problems of other humans in order opposite its at any price and regardless of the consequences one to wipe out (if you assume rnstlich, to be right with your diffuse presumptions)?

Select, Moitz - between them is nothing.

But you maintain for your God never again to be Christian. They are, ausweislich your behavior here -, maliciously and cowardly lied - the anti-thesis. No, not my. Those of what you give to be.