Wednesday, 22 November 2006 18:15
More importantly than the people becoming of Christ
The present wave of the US nationalism presents itself mankind as the nature, at which the world is to genesen.
(kreuz.net) at the end of of Septembers launched the archbishop of Prague, Miroslav cardinal Vlk, a violent public attack against catholic circles in its country.

Cardinal Vlk belongs the Fokolarbewegung and is considered as liberal.

Cause for its attacks was a lecture of professor John C. Rao in Prague. Rao is a professor for history at pc. the John's university in New York.

Its lecture took place on 9 September and of the pc. Joseph Institut and by the magazine `Katolík' was organized.

The lecture carried the title „the new world order and the war against the terrorism “.

On 25 September the historian in a longer statement answered to the heavy attacks of the cardinal.

It would have wished itself - so Rao - that cardinal Vlk would not publicly have led the discussion, but itself first would have endeavored to clarify the thing in the sense of the gospel in the personal discussion.

The lecture is - as the cardinal understood correctly - very critically been, professor Rao in its open letter writes:

„He criticized above all the US company “.

Professor Rao denunzierte „the allegedly free, democratic and friedfertige “US regime, which came out „due to historical erroneous trends from the American society and which seeks to spread the Bush government now by force over the whole globe. “

The lecture represented above all the missing respect of the US regime for other independent nations and cultures.

„Whole is incomprehensible for me, like you, to Eminenz, or everyone, which heard the admission of the lecture, from my words that I can design to Prague came, in order Anti-Americanism to stir up, that the” nationalism “,” Neo national socialism “,” anti-Semitism “,” Lefebvrianismus “or” Islamism “promotes. “

„Absolute astonishment “is the only word, which it can use as answer to the reproaches of the cardinal.

„My whole lecture was longer, nothing else as does not end wanting attack on the nationalism “- so the professor.

The modern nationalism - of Giuseppe Mazzini to George Bush - transforms the respectable love for the own country into a unakzeptable ideology of a pseudoreligious character.

In Prague it explained that the US nationalism is at present the clearest and most dangerous example of such a ideological pseudo religion.

It represent a world-wide threat for the legitimate patriotic aspirations of other countries and for the interests of the true religion.

The US nationalism comes - after professor Rao - in the political philosophy to the expression, which is usually called in former times „Americaism “and today „pluralism “.

To guarantee „this illegitimate nationalistic philosophy stated that America and the American system created a new, singular and infallible mechanism, in order the groups and individuals of all societies freedom and luck blessedness and their peaceful to secure democratic co-operation. “

Of all Americans a Vergötterung and an unconditional acceptance of this ideology and pseudo religion as proof of its national loyalty one expect.

This ideology is taught by political ceremonies and gentleman light, which were accomplished with public causes:

„One needs to read only the speeches, which are held in such instants by George Bush and others, in order to understand the sakralen character of these strange Liturgien, which are so opposite the spirit of a true American patriotism “.

Americaism and pluralism would see the USA and their way of life as an world-historical Kraft, which possessed a mission, „those universal and more releasing are as the people becoming “.

This global mission regard one as of God blessed: God led the Puritaner first into the new world, in order to establish there „the city on the mountain “.

Who resists its own independence in the name and cultural integrity of the world-wide acceptance of this Götzen, must be regarded as enemies of God and nature.

In the present surrounding field such humans are nothing else as „terrorists “.

Because only „a terrorist “would resist this historically unique gift of God and the reason.

He criticized the arrogant ideology of the Americaism and the pluralism in Prague - so professor Rao.

„Nevertheless see you, Eminenz, in my attack on this pseudo religion, the promotion of an intolerable” nationalism “. “

„As strange that someone supports the nationalism in your eyes thereby that it opposes unconditional distribution at its presently/immediately most threatening form. “

One needs - so professor Rao - the talent of a Samuel Beckett, in order to represent the logical twists, which are necessary to justify „around the acceptance of a in such a way humiliating catholic subjecting under a deceptive ideology which places itself even over the human being-nascent God. “
All reader opinions indicate 6 of 41 reader opinions:
Friday, 24 November 2006 19:01
<object width= „425 “height= „350 “><param name= „movie “value= „http://www.youtube.com/v/JP2YZGskECM “></param><param name= „wmode “value= „transparency “></param><embed src= „http://www.youtube.com/v/JP2YZGskECM “type= „application/x shockwave flash “wmode= „transparency “width= „425 “height= „350 “></embed></object>
Friday, 24 November 2006 12:49
NO COMMENT: @Murx
Friday, 24 November 2006 12:44
Benedikt: @ Murx
Contrary to you I am stop adaptive.

Friday, 24 November 2006 10:33
santa rita: @ Karl Murx
Apropos, why was the buildings 7 eingestürtzt?

In building 7 the operations center was accommodated, of where from the airplanes were made remote controlled and the breakups.
The breakup of the building No. 7 was an act of the trace removal. See Andreas's von Bülow, „the CIA and 11 September “.
Friday, 24 November 2006 09:11
Karl Murx † - 1: 11: 31: 19: What is to it for laughter?
In view of the fact that Hitler had contributed the statement of the governor general of Poland to this rumor, because he wanted to conceal the inzestuösen background of its family tree appeared reliably and received even into respectable works entrance.

Since my childhood I heard as matter of course, as other lies from this time. Contrary to you I am stop adaptive.
Thursday, 23 November 2006 23:55
Breze: @ Benedikt
I see the strewn rumor over Hitler Halbjudentum as a further argumentation of the alleged „Harmlosigkeit “to Jew pursuit and/or - eliminating.

If our dear Adolf were a half Jew, it cannot have been so bad with the Holocaust…

It would be ridiculous, if it were not so widerlich…
All reader opinions indicate 35 further reader opinions
The editorship does not take responsibility for contents of the contributions. She reserves herself the right to delete contributions as well as to exclude readers from the debate.
Copyright © 2009 kreuz.net