A Katholikin was indignant recently about an interview of the bishop von St. Pölten in a daily paper. But the bishop protested, it had given no interview to the newspaper. It has nevertheless - the sheet countered.

(, pc. Pölten kreuz.net) in its expenditure from 19 October 2006 the Austrian daily paper published `Kurier' an article over the bishop von St. Pölten.

Therein quotations became from an interview with Mons. Klaus Küng shown.

The bishop reports among other things of his efforts around a pacification of the Diözese pc. Pölten. This task is to a large extent final.

Not yet completely settled however the disposal „of the personnel refuse dumps is from the Krenn era “, continues to be called it in loud `the Kurier' on an exclusive interview which are based articles.

A gläubige Katholikin from the Diözese pc. Pölten showed up about the formulation „personnel refuse dumps “indignant.

It wrote the bishop and weighted about that bishop Menschen had called „refuse dumps “. That is contempting for human beings.

After some time the woman received a letter in reply from the bischöflichen secretariat.

In it stood: The bishop „draws the attention of you to that he did not give an interview to the newspaper concerned. They should not pull rashly from a newspaper report conclusions “.

The letter of the bischöflichen secretary Hildegard Rumpler was signed, like Mons. Küng and all coworkers in the bischöflichen secretariat of the neokonservativen Personalprälatur Opus Dei belong.

Mentioned Katholikin turned thereupon to the editorship of the daily paper `Kurier'. you inquired, what with the dubious interview on itself has it.

The answer of the daily paper: „We would never publish invented representations for reasons in principle freely. “

And further: „It is correct that it concerned no interview in the classical sense. But if bishop Antworten to the questions of a journalist gives, it is an interview probably nevertheless in the broadest sense. “

Again the Katholikin sat down to its computer and reported to the bishop von St. Pölten, which had received her from the newspaper.

Literally it wrote:

„Mr. bishop! […] They deceived me! Is that of a bishop worthy? Did you really believe that I am a primitive Landbewohnerin, which mouth dead with such lies one can make? “

© picture bishop Küng: Pressestelle Diözese pc. Pölten
© fig. pc. Pöltener CATHEDRAL: GNU Free documentation License

Wolfgang e.: Dear Heinrich,

It tunes already, you has the bishop not directly so called.

Perhaps you tell me however, as I their reader opinion down to correctly interpret am?:

„As my former boss said again and again? „The difference between smarter and asshole is frequently negligibly small. “Tja, Mr. bishop and my former boss was specialist in such things, more smart up to the excess. “

If my interpretation were wrong, please I höflichst around apology. Then I was unfortunately not smart enough to interpret their utterance correctly.

Still another general question to the editorship:

Isn't it amazing that the straight people, which out-divide much few put in can?
(To the correct interpretation, I do not want to be wrongly understood: kreuz.net is indeed not economically wehleidig with the Austeilen, but extraordinarily, if it must put in somewhat.)

HeinrichvonOfterdingen: Dear Wolfgang e, write you:

Due to this very thin story you feel now bemüßigt to call the bishop a cleveres asshole. In order to place that times correctly: I did not call the bishop in such a way. There you zusammengereimt yourselves somewhat, which is not located in such a way in my contribution. If you call and me somewhat subordinate the bishop in your contribution cleveres asshole, then I can express only my displeasure there. Please take to the knowledge.

franziskus: Much noise around nothing

With my heading I follow the majority.
Owing to been entitled +net for the pointed articles and the platform on which one knows also contrary opinions posts.
Sad are only the unpleasant mutual accusations or feeling outbreaks. Do not fit well into the before-Christmas time.
As it would be beautiful, if the contractors could meet not anonymous, but August in August simply as humans.
And the word is meat became, i.e. only, God son into whole mankind was in-born, not only into the Jewish people.

NB: Like one the material existence of a Paters to endanger can is veilful me.
A Pater did with its Armutsgelübde (if it was solemn) without each legal competency, because the medal up to the end of life provides for him.

Daniel Stöhr: @Maledica

„Which I have untrue stated???
Why should I have down-appreciated Lingen???
Probably rather the opposite is the case that I show for so a hopeless case, yet my brotherly love and mercy and employ me with this! “

In addition I would like to say actually nothing more, only: From where does their hate come? I ask you seriously: What does Pater Lingen other one, than the catholic teachings, how her of Christ, over which Apostel was delivered and until today, to announce? That is its crime! (and but he is legally pursued by the V2-Lager - i.e. its material existence is tried to destroy! Clarify please.)

Maledica: Slander

@GeSTÖHRt
It is not to be excluded naturally that it will proceed against it also criminally (slander).

§187 StGB
Who maintains or spreads an untrue fact against better knowledge in relationship on another, which is suitable the same to make verächtlich or in the public opinion down-worthy or its credit endanger, becomes with imprisonment up to two years or with fine and, if the act publicly, in a meeting or by spreading writings (§ 11 exp. 3) committed is punished, with imprisonment up to five years or with fine.

What did I maintain untrue???
Why should I have down-appreciated Lingen???
Probably rather the opposite is the case that I show for so a hopeless case, yet my brotherly love and mercy and employ me with this!

CampoSanto: LOL!!!

I again repeat my consideration from yesterday:

It lines up now to introduce punish and adhesion-legal examination whether the Mr. Stöhr and Lingen are not guilty of the roughly negligent or deliberate bodily injury.

I fall each time before laughter of my desk chair, if I read the contributions of and/or over these two.