Cells of surplus infants (embryos), but also cells and fabrics of driven off children are not only to be able to be transplanted. That plans in October the transplant ion law passed by the parliament. Lebensrechtler seized the referendum, in order to subject the law of a popular vote decided by the parliament.

(kreuz.net) Swiss parliamentarian Markus Wäfler underlines the urgency of a collection of signatures, in order to bring the decided transplant ion law to case. The collection of signatures must be final already on 27 January 2005. The committee against the transplant ion law did not launch, writes this second referendum in consideration of the main cell debate in November the inhabitant of zurich politician. Now however urge the time.

The law decided by Swiss parliament permits to transplant „embryonic or fötale human fabrics or cells “. It regulates grant procedures and seeks various possible abuses to prevent. The majority of the Swiss federal politicians is obvious after of the voting people for period solution in the year 2002 will to open to the Embryoverwertern also the field of the transplants.

That Switzerland needs a law for transplants, is undisputed. But according to national council Wäfler is up-pushed in this section „quietly the door for late abortions, already built in the new period solution, “- reason of enough for a referendum.

The detailed statutes indicate the ethical gray areas and problems, which the unrestrained usefulness thinking and winning vines of the industrial research create. So „time and method of an abortion must be selected independently of a later transplant “according to law.

Only after „the decision is certain to the abortion “, may the mother is at all inquired whether it agrees the use of their driven off child for transplant ion purposes. This may take place, if „the donator were comprehensively informed and the intended use freely and in writing agreed “.

It is easily conceivable, means national council Wäfler that the mother can lead an apparent industrial use of the abortion against arising debt feelings into the field.

A regulation meets the law also for pairs, whose desire to have children fulfilled with artificial fertilization technology led too `überzähligen' infants (embryos). Such pairs may be inquired for an industrial utilization of their infants only, after of them was determined „surplusness “.

Article 41 of the new law strives for one - illusionary - fence: In the transplant took part „may the medical personnel, who makes the requirement for pregnancy or who participates in the reproduction procedure, do not affect “. In addition national council Wäfler: „As if those, which procure the material, hear not on those, it to use want… “

Swiss parliamentarian continues: „The embryo or the foetus becomes only the people material if the involved ones make it - in such a way the legislator brings today the high-praised right of woman and Mr. Schweizer to individual self-determination and the interests to the research on a denominator. “

In the whole affair is to be differentiated between human fabric and cells on the one hand and the embryos and foetuses as organisms on the other hand. The law forbids only receiving surplus infants from artificial fertilizations beyond the seventh day regarding transplantation „as a whole artificially alive “. The regulation is not valid for parts of the body of the children and for children, who are pleased an abortion to the victim.

The inhabitant of zurich national council Markus Wäfler assumes the abortion business in Switzerland with the new law gets additional momentum: Because foetuses up to 12. Pregnancy week usually scraped out or abgesogen and „the final product of “these interferences for transplants is badly suitable, promote the law also late abortions.

Dolfus: Child meat market

That is nevertheless already long reality. Kinderföten as spare parts depots, world-wide. For living children different organizations are in Latin America and/or also in the sea-quake regions responsible.
What is mankind for a society of bad creatures? And there are nevertheless good people, which strive for God. Alone that is nevertheless already amazing.
„The more intelligent one gives way. Sad truth. She explains the rule of the stupid ones. “(after Marie of smoothing he ash brook)