Who publishes on `kreuz.net', - independently of contents of its contribution - by the publisher of the conservative theological magazine `Theologisches' is exkommuniziert immediately.

(kreuz.net) since 2003 the Cologne theologian David Berger (39) publishes the well-known conservative magazine `Theologisches'. Now it came to a conflict with the coworker for many years of the magazine, Dr. med. Wolfgang B. Lindemann.

For nearly ten years writes lime tree man for `Theologisches'. it still began his publication activity under Bergers predecessor, Prälat Ulrich Paul long one.

In all three special editions, which were published under David Bergers line, lime tree man with a long article was represented.

Co-operation ran - according to lime tree man data - always well. It received even warm letters of thanks from publisher Berger.

But then the summer came 2006. At that time lime tree man wrote on the express request Bergers an article for `Theologisches'.

Berger praised the submitted manuscript and assured a publication.

The good catholic call
In the meantime lime tree man wrote an article for the catholic Internet site `kreuz.net'.

The contribution is concerned with technical weaknesses of the theory of evolution - an area to the lime tree man for years publishes.

That came the publisher from `Theologisches' to ears. Hardly it quit lime tree man to two hours after appearance of the article by email? YES, by email! each further co-operation up:

„Of an acquaintance I was made attentive just now on it that you to a large extent publish false testimonies now also on that anonymous and with half truths and partly even demagogisch working Internet site `kreuz.net'.

As you know, it does not only depend with articles on contents, but also whereupon, from whom these come and where they stand.

Therefore I have now largest problems to let you work further as an author of `Theologisches'. I hope, you have for my situation as a publisher of a magazine, which always paid attention to its well catholic call, understanding! “

The report met lime tree man like lightning from cheerful sky.

No answer
It did not let anything unversucht, in order to clear the situation up and the possibility for the publication in one of the few still theological magazines which can be called catholic keep.

Lime tree man offered to the publisher of `Theologisches' to only write immediately under an alias on `kreuz.net'.

He explained that he a honorary Schriftenapostolat to evolution criticism, creationism, Pastoralmedizin and Pastoraltheologie operate.

Lime tree man referred also to the many catholic organizations and personalities, which co-operate with `kreuz.net' or exchange with the portal a banner.

It is inconceivable that a unique publication leads with `kreuz.net' in faith-faithful circles to a not revocable Disqualifizierung.

Lime tree man even asked a common acquaintance for switching.

But publisher Berger did not answer to the explanations of lime tree man.

Before the mediator it stated that the article had written, the lime tree man for `Theologisches', published even in the meantime already elsewhere is.

Lime tree man is in all other respects disqualifiziert due to the unique publication of an article on `kreuz.net' definitely a theological magazine respectable as an author like `Theologisches'.

Disqualifiziert itself
The amazing of this argumentation consists of it that David Berger published in the meantime officially on a sharply anti-church plagiarism web page, as Gegenprojekt too `kreuz.net' understands themselves and imprint among other things about „gay, lesbians, Muslim “claimant becomes loud.

On this homepage he writes Lindenmann' skurrile Postings also under own name as well as under the reader name `- around the call of the outlawed coworker from `Theologisches' to obviously damage.

Now lime tree man resists the treatment by the publisher of `Theologisches'. it in Cologne Berger even a complaint because of breach of contract submitted.

Lime tree man believes that in his case is present, which is called in the natural science „scientific misconduct “- the evaluation independently of scientific papers of their contents and quality.

Before court lime tree man would like to show that David Berger is charakterlich suitable, to publish a theological technical periodical.

For this reason lime tree man published also his complete exchange of letters with the publisher of `Theologisches' in the Internet.

santo domingo: @ God hard

To the judgement there is also a short article with Diskussionsthread in the reader newspaper (and with kreuts.net the article can be discussed by M.Kirschbaum likewise).

God hard: Lime tree man?

greatly! … lost on the whole line…

kreuts.net/forum: Dr. Lindemann a case for the psychiatrist

who-have-me-ignited?: kreuts.net

http://kreuts.net/wordpress/

could be genuine gg

Pünktchen: „Schopenhauer “

They do not need to quote, me are well-known these texts! The problem is however that Sch. its promise to make true cannot to show philosophically and systems-inherently conclusively that „an abolition and a self denial of the will are possible “in also only one of its features. In the art it comes to commit-being issued silence of the will („Quietiv “), but the examples of „holyness “u „illumination “and such, which state Schopenhauer, remains faith thing such as Christ Ascension Day and the virgin birth. Schopenhauer derives the intellect from the will and sees it in the Frondienste of the same. How should it be able itself to turn against the omnipotence of the Urprinzips and with which source of strength? As one can want not to want. And isn't such willentliches non--wools contradictory and even again wanting? …

Schopenhauer remained itself time life of the fact consciously that it did not become partners of this „expiring “, this release. It must accept these phenomena thus as of others certified, it follows not very conclusively from its philosophy!

I do not have however to admit, if one deletes the Schopenhauer „release teachings “from the system, then break down this yet by any means! It becomes only a little more hopeless…

Schopenhauer2: @ Pünktchen

„However humans is most perfect feature will, to exist which, in order, as in second book shown, of so high degrees of realization lit up had that in this even a completely adequate repetition of the nature of the world under the form of the conception, which the view of of the Platonic ones ideas, which is pure mirrors of the world, possible ward, as we know it in the third book learned.
In humans thus the will can arrive at complete self-confidence, at clear and exhaustive recognizing of its own nature, how it abspiegelt itself in the whole world. Out of the real presence of this degree of realization goes, as we in the previous book saw, the art out. At the end of our whole view in addition, it will result that by the same realization, as the will refers it to itself an abolition and a self denial of the same are possible in its most perfect feature: so that the freedom which otherwise, when only the thing coming, never in the feature it can actually show up in such case also in this steps out and, by waiving the feature at the basis lying natures, while this still continues in the time, brings a contradiction out of the Erscheinun with itself and straight thereby the phenomena of the holyness and self denial represents. “

Schopnehauer, world as will and conception, first volumes, IVTH book