Betrayal is betrayal. It must be punished also in the church. Because where traitors roam themselves, no hope can arise.

(, Chur kreuz.net) „23 selected, worthy cathedral gentlemen, who work under express official secret, from the outside permeable like a ten-year raincoat. “

To this realization Fridolin Hauser came to the choice of the new bishop von Chur, whose result a traitorous cathedral gentleman rapportiert still on the day of the choice of the press.

Hauser is a former mayor of the 4,000 souls municipality Näfels in the canton Glarus. He expressed himself in a longer article for the local free newspaper `Fridolin'.

Hauser pleads to determine „the singer “and to arrange its immediate resignation too:

The traitor would have exceeded the irreverent newspaper report through „Geschwätzigkeit and injury of the professional secrecy “.

In view of the betrayal Hauser demands even to dismiss the whole 23köpfige Kollegium stante pede.

The cathedral chapter is ordered as a collective, in order to represent the community of the church:

„The deviation of a particular - or several - is an intolerable injury of the community of the church and all believers. “You leave to one „miserable impression “.

The leakage is particularly bad, because it must act with cathedral gentlemen actually over „elite people “.

The office may be transferred to priests, who are characterised by Rechtgläubigkeit as well as a blameless life change according to church right only and which in praise-worth way expenditure-practiced their service.

Hauser hopes that the believers were not confused by the message „of the singing cathedral gentleman “and „the Abqualifikationen “of the new bishop already hurrying ahead in daily papers.

Rather the choice of the bishop a service is to new hope is:

„Hope can however hardly to arise, if a bishop choice, which is subordinate to a secret procedure for the protection of the candidates, the choice committee and the office for bishop, threatens to become made of one's own fault of the choice collective the Zeitungskolportage or Hintertreppenaffäre. “

Sentinel: @leshandl1

Naja, in which case I would dismiss the 23 churer cathedral gentlemen completely and the new cathedral gentlemen, in this case the new bishop, simply once be worked could.

And if that does not help all anything, ' s gives still alternative to B:

The Churer cathedral burn down and equal cathedral gentlemen also! All 24 then.

Then afterwards also none is disadvantaged.

leshandl1: If one the Churer cathedral gentleman

thus verarscht, does how it happened with this „choice “, why should be silent also still in addition? The selective procedure was nevertheless a farce. It surprises me only that and like for a long time thinking Swiss catholic such Schwindeleien let themselves be offered still.

Britta: Office secret and Beichtgeheimnis

From the circle of the Churer cathedral gentlemen „an official secret was passed on “to the press. Who was it? None knows and wants none to apparent know and/or punish. I ask myself however: still is the Beichtgeheimnis protected with a priest, who surrenders an official secret?

matt2 †: If an electoral fraud were present, ask…

here ' s goes nevertheless only around the fact that a careless - or possibly also bad-willing person - expenditure-chatted an election result already existing promptly. Large scandal, wa? The crowd of the priests and the believer, who are subordinate to the bishop, will probably be able themselves to make a picture over it and but not the judgement of the anti-church Journalie will consult. Prominent ones of clergyman, those the world devil not genehm are anyway always stand in the line of fire and are not its crept suspended. That should be nevertheless clear us.

Aleph: matt2

Why does one have to constantly turn up the old dirt again?

Hello matt 2

Does it give which more beautiful than in old dirt to suhlen and gebräunt from it to up-arise? That has which. That isses…!

matt2 †: @Heggi: Now, I have momentarily nothing better to do…

„23 selected, worthy cathedral gentlemen, who work under express official secret, from the outside permeable like a ten-year raincoat. “

and which takes the liberty there this Stänkerer Hauser? That is to hold the mouth nevertheless and which kreuz.net with its statement takes the liberty a passing possibly only one person to blow up here. Something, which anyway of importance is not, since it experienced the public evenly a little in former times, well and?