In the year 1988 a scientific investigation explained the Turiner grave cloth as latemedieval falsification. The Turiner archbishop placed itself hasty behind this result. Now it became admits that the material examined at that time was taken from a patch put on later.

(, Turin kreuz.net) in the year 1988 the grave cloth was examined of Turin von Experten of the universities in Zurich, Oxford and Arizona and called in a spectacular media conference falsification.

The grave cloth is a four meter long material volume, on which the shadeful illustration of a bloody people body is visible. It is to have served Jesu of Christ as corpse cloth for the grave putting.

After a dating with the usual radio carbon method the researchers announced that the material was woven between 1260 and 1390 after Christ. The grave cloth Jesu is a simple medieval rag. The archbishop at that time of Turin, Anastasio Alberto cardinal Ballestrero hurried to recognize the results of the experts and called the grave cloth falsification.

But the erzbischöflich approbierten scientific results were disproved now by an article, which appeared in the chemical technical periodical „Thermochimica Acta “. Its author is Dr. Raymond Rogers, a retired chemist at „the Los Alamos national Laboratory “in the US Federal State again Mexico.

„The Los Alamos national Laboratory “is a research establishment in the areas physics, chemistry, biology and mathematics north of Santa Fe in new Mexico. It accommodates one of the largest institutes for theoretical research in the world and has 6000 coworkers.

In its article Rogers represents the view that the grave cloth between 1.300 must be 3,000 years old and. Expressly it contradicts the results of the Karbon-14-Tests, according to which the grave cloth would be a latemedieval falsification: „The sample, which was taken for the radio carbon investigation, possesses completely different chemical characteristics than the main piece of the cloth. “

Rogers discovered that examined 1988 piece of the grave cloth a medieval patch was taken, which became to eingewoben at that time into the cloth, in order to repair a fire damage.

He heard the theory of the patch already in former times and considered this possibility very improbable. It was embarrassing for it „“to revise its opinion meant Rogers before the BBC.

The grave cloth was damaged in the course of the centuries by different conflagrations. Monastery women made themselves therefore again and again to plug the holes and sticken the cloth on a supporting material document

Out of such a part the sample for the radio carbon test was taken. The piece continues to contain coloring materials, which could not be proven at the remainder of the cloth, of explained Rogers.

For the age proof of materials the chemist uses the Vanillin method. Vanillin occurs in line fibers, disintegrates however in the course of the centuries. Vanillin can be determined in the 1988 taken sample, as well as in the material document of the grave cloth added later. In the fibers of the actual grave cloth against it - as in other very old line materials - no more Vanillin is to be proven. Therefore the grave cloth must be old 1,300 to 3,000 years.

Some it hope now that the Vatikan will permit a second examination of the grave cloth. In addition Michael Minor, the vice-president „of the American society for the investigation of the grave cloth means “: „The church is very very hesitant to introduce a renewed investigation because such tests already led to so many each other contradicting results. “

Already 1999 had examined Avinoam Danin of „the Hebrew university “in Jerusalem flower polling, which was found on the grave cloth. At that time he explained: „One finds this combination of flowers only in a part of the world. Everything points to the area around Jerusalem. “Temporal the wise polling mixture likewise rather on the time over Christ birth as on the late Middle Ages.

Rose wreath/ring soldier: HR Dipling Benning

Aufgemalt cannot be it
A casting is ae also not…

Tja from where woh comes ---hmmmm

Heureka: I a emprischfundamentalrastionalmateriellwissenschaftliche explanation found:

The arrangement of the points of pigment is purely coincidental. And like the coincidence wants coincidentally a picture in such a way developed.

Who which other one is stated unscientifically and a reaktionääääärer fundamentalist. (thus completely more badly)

HeinrichderZweite: Now dear Mr. Benning,

the dear God does not know itself obviously with projection as well from as you. Do you want to say to us thereby?

Dipl. - Ing.M.Benning: Turiner grave cloth

So much it many also displeased likes,

the Turiner grave cloth cannot be in my opinion the grave cloth of Jesus Christ or at all the casting of a human covering.

I justify this as follows:
If a cloth is presented on a body, e.g. on the face, then I later never see the face, but the completion of the face. Thus for example a nose would be not 1-2 cm broad, but 6-7 cm. broadly. A simple self attempt could help: Simply a towel take and the face with hue cream eincremen. Present afterwards the cloth on the face. After decrease of the cloth is to be seen here into the broad distorted face casting. This does not have similarity with an illustration as on the Turiner grave cloth!

---or here a miracle was caused, then I must take everything back and hope for forgiveness!! --

Yours sincerely
Markus Benning

Dr. Otterbeck: In the year 2002

the NDR one brit. Transferred television contribution to dt. version, according to which Vinci falsified the grave cloth there, as a kind early photography (its).

One is surprised, what the media of everything accept as „science “, as long as it goes against the fact of resurrection Jesu.

Avaron: What makes it whether Jesus under the cloth lived?

The whole speculations over Jesus still living under the cloth show in my opinion no real statement over something. Purchased humans again with the life to naturally sometime begin must are tautology. And Jesus naturally its life into its grave cloth wrapped gets back to have must is probably just as natural. The assumption Jesus under this cloth lived again-spoken thus in no case of the Auferstehungstheorie. Further is completely doubtful me as a medical layman, as maltreat, at least liveless working body (otherwise it would probably hardly have been removed from the cross) is to survive the period of 3 days without drinking or eating in a komatösen condition. When, see further indication for the Auferstehungstheorie I, which is in principle it possible, which was only Jesus komatös. Since his working and the description its do not however only begin after its death, separate before, is me the coincidence, straight these humans, who worked before already religiously, its Kreuzigung to survive should (I proceed here from the assumption, whom surviving the Kreuzigung if at all possible an extremely rare Ereigniss represents).

Benedikt: @ Felzmann

I estimate that the Turiner cloth has the potential to place the Christian religion still on the head.

Well then you hope times beautifully. Unfortunately will however in vain be. Because facts, which by institutes are bent in such a way that one can put the Christian religion as swindles - „to prove “already generations strive, so far without each success (should give to think) - to be able also just as again in the other direction to be interpreted, so also the facts brought out by you. And it should actually - which I do not believe - ever someone to prove to be able that the man under the cloth still, then am only the proof lived furnished thereby that it did not concern the grave cloth Jesu evenly nevertheless. Their hopes are offering no prospects, Mr. Felzmann.