In Germany is located a film before the premiere, which by the there film promotion one did not finance. Interview with the producer.

(kreuz.net) „the film is dedicated to my driven off children “- Fritz Poppenberg (58) explained forwards `kreuz.net' as his youngest film. Poppenberg is a German cameraman, film producer and a film director.

Its newest documentary film carries Maria the title „and their children “. It concerns into it the taboo topic abortion.

The deeply moving strip reports of the midwife Maria Grundberger. Before one Munich institute for abortion addresses it since years of mothers, who want to drive their children off.

Mrs. Grundberger created it to induce hundreds of mothers to the reorientation and to protect her the killing of the own child.

The film is uraufgeführt on Saturday in the Urania in Berlin.

Maps for the premiere are to be ordered under [0049] 030 30810740.
Mr. Poppenberg, why this film?

Maria Grundberger contributed crucially to save hundred child lives. Over such outstanding humans books are usually written, designated Straßenschilder after them and turned films.

Really?

Think only of the degree of fame and the attention, which [the manufacturer] Oskar Schindler († 1974) postum by the feature `Schindlers Liste' experienced.

Does Maria Grundberger expect similar echo?

No. The life-saving work of Mrs. Grundberger is ignored to a large extent or slandered - for example from tool NIST inside in the magazine `Emma' - even as terror.

Therefore?

I mean that Maria Grundbergers work our respect earned and admits be made should.

Why?

Mrs. Grundberger stands contrary to the fundamentalist distorted image, which the abortion-oriented media of Lebensschützern produced.

How looks concrete?

In Mrs. Grundberger a pleasant young Mrs., the assistance meets the mothers and fathers before the abortion hospital offers.

Friendly and certainly it reminds of that the unborn child exists and possesses its own interests.

How does it make that?

Mrs. Grundberger is compelling to retrieve in few seconds which the by the state authorized advisory boards suppressed - to the life right of the child to refer.

The result?

That it could induce several hundred mothers and fathers on the Gehsteig not to let their child kill is on the one side great and hopeful.

On the other hand it means the moral bankruptcy [abortion network] `pro of the Familia' and similar organizations with misleading names, which issue killing licenses in great quantities, without worrying - in such a way it seems - about the dramatic conflict, in which most women are.

Is the film an account with Abtreibern?

The film is neither accusing nor reproachful against humans, who drove off. It is by the way means dedicated own driven off children.

What are contents of the film?

The spectator experiences more exact over Maria Grundberger and the so-called going climbing consultation.

Are shown also some the grateful mothers with their saved babies - which moves emotional naturally extraordinarily.

In addition one experiences the mourning and despair of men and women, who were enticed to the abortion of their child or even forced.

Is the film political?

A film to this topic is inevitably political. He formulates clear criticism at a state, which for obligation and seduction is crucially responsible in this connection.

What wants to cause your film?

I believe that this film will induce humans to the Mitfühlen and thinking. The model of Maria Grundberger - there I am convinced - will lead to that young mothers and fathers from the Abtreibungshypnose awake and remain protected the terrible trauma of the killing of the own child.

What was the strongest impression with the shootings?

The faces from women to abortion.

How do such mothers look?

Most of them came like living dead ones from that Munich rear spar from hospital.
Often characteristically „the best friend participated “as company.

How did many of these women see you?

On the first day of my search about ten or twelve women came out in distances. Their faces without lives. Bleach like death.

To protect some tried laboriously the outside form. Others also in addition hardly found more Kraft.

How did you react to these fright pictures?

At that time I was shocked and thought: That is thus the freeing of the Mrs., the self-determination, the emancipation. All masks of death.

One said to Maria schluchzend in passing: „You were right! That was the largest error of my life! “

How does the Filmbranche react to your strips?

During an air passage I could throw a view of Germany recently from above: the picture is determined by yellow rape and green corn fields.

What do you mean?

Our farmers were brought by a mixture from seduction and bribery to degradieren the country to a Monokultur with probably devastating consequences.
It looks similar in the Filmbranche.

Can you would drive out?

The Filmbranche hangs to drips the film promotion. It brings nearly only politically correct out. That resembles a mental environmental contamination.

Exceptions like the Oskar film „the life of the others “[the producer Florian Henckel of Donnersmarck] or „the fall “confirm only the rule.

How do you see the future?

So for a long time the Filmbranche as independent variable existed, will not be able to bring it to the topic to abortion only that, which we already know - an overemphasis of the self-determination of the woman. The death struggle of the foetus and immeasurable suffering of the women after abortion are good concealed.

Where will their film have to be seen?

There was already a demonstration before male convicts in a penal institution. They were affected and wished a far spreading to the film deeply.

At this moment there is already a quantity inquiries after demonstrations. But, if the film is noticed as particularly valuable and reached a certain degree of fame, we will only then organize for example also Kinovorführungen and demonstrations before grades in the larger yardstick.

The film the viewers to remain withheld?

That is in quasi equal to switched public - legal television to fear.

But many viewers have a DVD player and our special attention on the DVD selling lie there, the film - like also our other politically not correct films already - will be seen.

In addition „Maria and their children are offered “by further publishing houses and dispatch bookshops.

During the citizens of Berlin premiere also Robert Buckley, coworker `of the United States Holocaust Memorial will speak Museum'. Why?

Mr. Buckley will remind us of the history of a boy with Hüftleiden, which should be killed in the context of the T4-Aktion by the National Socialists.

The mother of the boy fought for his life. She kidnapped it under dramatic circumstances in last second from the hospital. It survived - like the children saved by Maria.

We regain some elements of its history today in changed form.

How changes?

Also today hunt for handicapped children is made. They are only sought out already in the body of the mother.

And otherwise?

Some more changed. Most mothers do not fight any longer for their handicapped children. They go „voluntarily “and to leave their child to kill.

Oh so, there is still another further change:

Most killed children have no handicap.

© pictures: Three lime trees film

Josef Preßlmayer: Alois bishop: „Only because a coworker of the Holocaust of museum speaks during the premiere… “

The fact that a coworker of the Holocaust Memorial speaks during this premiere is extremely remarkable, since people react such as Leblhuber and GerdEric „with abhorrence “if such parallels and similarities between LV and baby Holocaust are pointed out, which they call „Holocaustrelativierung “.

There is already open Jewish New York Times, because it apologized for suppressing for many years of Holocaust information.

Nobody was under the Aliierten and the Weltjudentum, which warned the Jews before the Vernichtungstranporten, how Auschwitzausbrecher Vrba deplored.

Also the suicide of Zygielbojm, which called the dormant ones „accomplices of the murderers “, remained futile. It is this clear facts of omitted assistance.

The same information suppression happens today: „You were right, that were the largest error of my life “, say women after the abortion.

Killing their child becomes them as „period solution “angepriesen, which does not leave „traces “and „no influence on the fertility “has, as Abtreiber Fiala is falsely maintained and supported by minister Kdolsky and Volksanwalt Kostelka.

If only you, Mr. bishop a Gebetsvigil before one abortion-clinch yourself attach and certification give against the Genocid, to the Holocaust at the unborn children, then have they already somewhat done and only not delivered lip-service, how those put those at that time and today their hands into the lap.

Bokrug †: Rotary clubs of the anglo American free bricklaying and also the Zionists have the editorships bes.

Creates the tariffs off and supports the free trade, then our workers are down-brought to the economy in each range as in Europe on the level by body-own and Paupern.

(Abraham Lincoln, 16.Präs.der the USA 1860-1865)

„The usurer is hated with fullest right, because the money is the source of the acquisition here and not to the fact it is used to which it invented ward. Because for the exchange of goods it, the interest developed however makes from money more money… it [is] from all branches of trade the nature-most adverse. “

Aristoteles, politics 1.3 in Gero Jenners „the end of capitalism “

The proximity to the world of the money can affect however sometimes the scientific truth search also, at least in America: There, in an anonymous questioning among 2167 scientists, each fifth grants in the last three years results to have held back in order not to endanger current patent requests, or unwanted results to have retarded. , Experts mean, would even never come some unpleasant realization to the light. H. - U. Grimm „out devil pot “

Benedikt: Free press

Free press does not mean (and it has never meant) that an editor is free in the interior relationship to his editorship „“. Free press means the freedom of national influences on the respective press organ. Institut of the free press would guarantee a freedom of the press in the interior relationship, then this no more than freedom of the press could be sold, since it would rob the respective Zeitungsmacher of each possibility of positioning its press organ contentwise. It would be permanently its editors delivered by constitutional law. That would be then probably the first fundamental right, which takes rights in reality.

Bokrug †: more @Leblhuber: Provably…!

Over „the free press “:

John Swinton (1829-1901)
US-American newspaper publisher

„I am paid weekly in order to hold out my honest opinion from the newspaper, with which I am connected. […] If I would permit it to me to let my honest opinion in an expenditure of my newspaper appear would be I mean occupation before expiration of the daily loose. “- Before editors in the year 1889, quotes after: Richard O. Boyer and Herbert M. Morais, Labor's Untold story, NY: United Electrical, radio & Machine Workers OF America, 1955/1979

„The task of the journalists is it to destroy the truth to lie straight out to rotate, to revile, before the feet of the Mammons to kuschen and its country and its race around his daily bread to sell. They know it and I white it. “- Before editors in the year 1889, quotes after: Richard O. Boyer and Herbert M. Morais, Labor's Untold story, NY: United Electrical, radio & Machine Workers OF America, 1955/1979

I correct myself further concerning an earlier contribution: Already Abraham Lincoln expressed himself against the free trade!

Creates the tariffs off and supports the free trade, then our workers are down-brought to the economy in each range as in Europe on the level by body-own and Paupern.

(Abraham Lincoln, 16.Präs.der the USA 1860-1865)

„The usurer is hated with fullest right, because the money is the source of the acquisition here and not to the fact it is used to which it e…

Leblhuber: @Bokrug:

They copy here a not examinable statement of John Swainton from the 20's, which on the ZUNDELSITE stands. People, like the NPD parliamentary group chairman in the Lahn Dill circle tend to quote.
http://www.npd-lahn-dill.de/… dy_pressekritik.html

Their other neuroses are reflected on http://www.verschwoerungen.info/wiki/Weltherrschaft

About your Mittelstandsinstitut and its confused heads in things national economy I do not talk only at all.

They seem as foreigncertain as a puppet. Try instead of its to think nevertheless!

Bokrug †: @Florian Geyer: Very correctly…

The Rockefellers (CIA tester, standard oil and Chase Manhattan Bank) as well as Bush and Kerrys is member in the Skull&Bones medal.

Bush, Rockfeller and Morgan Stanley financed (Rockefeller and Stanley Morgan) as majority shareholders of the FED and/or federal Reserve Bank FED of the USA also the Nazis.

http://… ia.portland.indymedia.org/… s/2004/10/299828.jpg