It is easy and today accepted to make the Muslims responsible - above all, if one does not know the circumstances. By Dr. Heidemarie Seblatnig, Vienna.

(kreuz.net) five days ago I turned the column and the foundation from Turkey von Dreharbeiten to my film „. Christian in Turkey “back.

Their report of yesterday on the attack on an Italian Pater shocks me much, because in this country completely different picture ordered itself to me.

Representatives of the catholic church as well as the orthodox and Armenian community showed me its municipalities and the good relationship of the believers to their Muslim environment.

The churches were in very good condition.

The establishment of contact with the bishops and Patriarchen before my journey to Turkey folded outstanding. The public places gave completely unproblematically permission for filming the cultural properties.

Representatives of the religious communities offered guidance and any assistance to me. I received interviews from many Christians and Muslim historians and Wissenschaftern.

I had the only communication problem with yesterday from `kreuz.net' quoted archbishop the Ruggero Franceschini of Smirna (65).

I must anticipate that I am catholic, and this film with faith questions and with the Sakralarchitektur in Turkey is occupied.

We sent first a Turkish fax with contents of the project to archbishop Franceschini as well as to all other church representatives. After we had not received an answer only from archbishop Franceschini, my Turkish interpreter tried by telephone to manufacture the contact with it.

It was very unfriendly rejected by a woman employee, who knew hardly Turkish. The woman explained not to be responsible.

Since I regarded the whole as a linguistic misunderstanding, I asked bishop Luigi Padovese (60) - the Apostoli Vikar of Anatolia - in Iskenderun around assistance.

Mons. Padovese recommended to me to send an Italian fax. We did and received that again no answer.

Since we did not have anybody handy, the Italian spoke, let we it thereby bewenden.

For me now the question arises whether there are here linguistic communication problems?

I hold it for urgent that church coworkers, who are active in Turkey know also the Turkish language.

The Christian messages, which were not investigated exactly, do not help reliably.

The author is a film script authoress, producer and Universitätsdozentin in Vienna. In June 2006 it published the book „everyday Sakralarchitektur in Vienna starting from 1960 “.

Pünktchen: Abu to VirO:

It depends on contents of a book. You can examine that. As old the author is and which way he went, that is secondary. Likewise the publishing house, the row etc.…

On the other hand you offend nevertheless at every step and turn. Everywhere the reference is enough to you on it that this o. that author in an allegedly zionistisch freimaurerisch geheimdienstlich contaminated publishing house or organ (e.g. the newspaper „Die Welt “) publishes - already a-priori-judgement is over it pleases.

Everywhere you see yourselves relieved to take opposing opinions contentwise to the knowledge and too „examine “, if they want to have constituted them with the smallest indications as part of the large world conspiracy.

Abu: virOblationis

It depends on contents of a book. You can examine that. As old the author is and which way he went, that is secondary. Likewise the publishing house, the row etc. if you after old father manners proceed, then you will find excluding entrance to the mainstream. They do not believe nevertheless in Ernst that also only one full professor, a only one well-known publishing house, gets involved a only one renowned row in something, which is in such a manner delicate? Certainly, I said, one must make reductions. That must you however with „respectable “and „tidy “works also. We cannot wait for that someone large, which has to lose nothing more, concerns a topic like the political influence of the free bricklaying. Even if it concerns with such a book a niche existence, I remain with recommending it to you and all because there is not a comparable gathering of material. And I bet one: If the steep thesis of the author would cover itself apriori with your own assumptions and opinions, you became completely fast the remainder rear-employ and at the most over the strange Úmstände mokieren yourselves: e.g. that a young inexperienced historian must come there, in order to-close itself there finally once; that no tidy publishing house accesses there etc. however like you want: Remain immune. Pitch for it.

virOblationis: Hobby historian

A young historian must undertake only once studies in closely limited fields, in order with the methods of its subject to be trusted completely. Then it walks away to first independent, scientific work. Perhaps after many years of the occupation with certain topics, he comes as one of the few historians to a comprehensive thesis, which refers to larger area.

All these years of the trouble and work cannot be jumped over. If someone like Wolfgang Eggert (geb. 1962) immediately a dreibändiges work with one - carefully expressed - extremely steep thesis - submits, then it can be only a scientific Rohrkrepierer.

Even if I still read then that the work in one appeared „edition Hermetika “, then this information supplies still the i-Tüpfelchen.

If one finally experiences that the author wants to have uncovered already completely different secret, i.e., one can call the emergence of the AIDS illness only: „Enough, enough! “

Abu: VirOblationis, can be made you times not kirre.

„Conspiracy theory “you mean one? „The term is often used for it, opinions as unfoundedly, irrationally, abseitig, to put paranoid and world-descriptive closed. “(Wikipedia)

, It occupies „the opinion “, which speaks Eggert. It stated thus simply something and does not bend the reality in this sense by right. He collected material and assigned it historically. They are educated humans, you can that regard. If you sources are suspect, you can examine those in the library (participate even Pius X sources). And there I do not accept that you have sympathies for freemason (the actual topic of the book), will you did not beichten to have that you read that (Leblhuber does not go nevertheless beichten!).

Protestant: @heimwehr

You might probably hardly meet Naja, with the name and the dialect!

home resistance: Protestant

herns passns on dassma vorm run net komman!