Approximately 90% of the population suffer from Karies. Then is the refutation of the tooth hygiene? By Sedisvakantisten Pater Rolf Hermann Lingen.

(kreuz.net) most celebrate to Christmas, but they do not celebrate Christmas. The birth of Christ does not play a role for it.

Which interests most to Christmas primarily, Christmas holidays, Christmas benefit, Christmas meal are - however evenly not Christmas.

Furthermore it says some that the Christianity is in view of unfairness and wars rampantly growing everywhere failed, disproved.

If the angels announced the peace on ground connection with the birth of Christ, how everywhere discord can prevail?

A comparison from the medicine illustrates the unreasonableness of such statements. Approximately 90% of the population suffer from Karies. Then is the refutation of the tooth hygiene?

Similar: If the peoples against Christ, whom peace princes decide, the discord resulting from it is now indeed not the Christianity to charge.

That unchristianness is the refutation of Christ, is a ridiculous pretext, with which wants to steal itself their representative from the responsibility.

Somewhat so-called scientists give themselves more trouble during the anti-Christian incitement of the masses. They hope that their lies are discovered not immediately by its nothing-suspecting public.

Thus the citizen of Berlin old historian Alexander Demandt (70) in the Christmas booklet of this year „of the German medical weekly revue announces “his anti-Christian ideology over the origin of Christmas.

There it means to the family trees Jesu: „Two are delivered and do not agree not. Both marks runs the descent over Joseph, which was considered therefore at present their drawing up still as a father Jesu. Also the Apostel Paulus calls Jesus born from the seed of David and holds thereby to the paternity Josephs. “

It is correct that Jesu family tree is listed with Matthäus von Abraham on Jesus, with Lukas however by Jesus on Adam.

It is also correct that both family trees omit some sexes.

But however the correct explanation for the differences to look likes: In each case both family trees fulfill the task, Jesus as the promised Messiah and its meaning for the entire Menschengeschlecht to put out.

Never they spend Jesus as a physical son Josephs, quite the reverse: Matthäus changes expressly the sentence structure „from Abraham comes for Isaak, from Isaak Jakob “.

Instead of writing: „Of Joseph Jesus comes “, formulates Matthäus: „of the Jakobs Joseph, the man Marias comes. Of their Jesus was born “(Mt 1.16).

And Lukas formulates Jesu in the family tree: „One regarded it as the son Josephs. “


The holy Paulus writes that Jesus that comes Flei after from the sex of David (Röm 1.3). That means that it possesses a human nature and thus true humans is.

But Paulus speaks also unmistakably of the divinity of Christ. The Galater Paulus that it pleased God, writes „its son in me to reveal. I should announce it under the heaths “(Gal 1.15).

In the Titusbrief Paulus of „hope for the feature of the glory of the large God, our Heilandes Jesus Christ “(Tit 2.13) writes.

Briefly: Which this alleged stories scientist tells about the physical paternity Josephs, is a bright lie.

In the article of this stories counterfeiter it is called then recapitulatory:

„The historian cannot accept the revealing character of individual traditions, because they agree among themselves not and contradict altogether the reason. If we look for God hand in history, then we can see them not in individual interferences, but only in the happening as whole. “

If one understands somewhat or does not want not to understand, that necessarily does not mean that it contradicts the reason.

Manuel Böhm: Information to Rolf Hermann Lingen

Unfortunately I had to state again and again that a certain „Pater “Rolf Hermann Lingen, the founder of a sect fights named „to church for put in a word “kzm, prhl, against the Roman catholic church, the priest brother shank pc. Pius Xth and against Pater Andreas Endl and the heart Jesu Franziskaner. Lingens slander tactics are sufficiently well-known. Lingen publishes its slanders in the Internet under the alias „reports “- „facts “and narrations third, so that the harmless impression develops, he only „facts “would publish. Under this cover Lingen with preference under the false designation acts „Roman-catholic priest “and slanders permanently integre priests and all those, who its view are not. It is understandable that Rolf Hermann Lingen had to answer for itself already repeatedly before German courts.
Interesting information to Rolf Hermann Lingen and its sect „kzm “finds you:

http://andreasendl.info/mybb/showthread.php?tid=8

They can register and along-discuss also in this forum. Further topics in this forum are Pater Andreas Endl and the heart Jesu Franziskaner.

Br. Engelbert: Rolf Hermann Lingen

Why and does slander does Rolf Hermann Lingen insult the catholic church and Pope Benedikt XVI?

District court Dorsten condemned Rolf Hermann Lingen:
The accused made itself evidently from the judgement tenor punishable after the result of main hearing of 01.04.2008 as. In detail on the certified accusation set of the public prosecutor's office meal is taken to that extent by 25.05.2007 the purchase. In the view to it that on the one hand preloadings are given, the accused on the other hand because of a paranoiden personality disturbance in the sense § 21 StGB is only decreased criminally liable as well as on its financial conditions was appropriate a fine from 60 daily rates to 10,00 euros each.

Rolf Lingen is it by judgement of the regional court Bonn from 7 June 1999 (Az. 7 0 154/99) forbids to call itself and/or his Internet appearance also only „catholic “. The regional court Bonn imposed on 5 November 2003 against the plaintiff because of offence against the omission obligation contained in the judgement of the regional court from 7 June 1999 an order money of 10.000, to 00 euro.

The Kongregation for the faith teachings of the Roman-catholic church stated already years ago that „priest-dedicate “from Rolf Hermann Lingen is invalid.
Why does Mr. Lingen play then still priests and does hold to his priest fantasies?

Br. Engelbert
http://kongregation.info

Rudolfus: @D. Stöhr: Pater Lingen is expressed in that Posting very misleadingly

>>Wenn someone (rightfully!) concerning the Holocaust lies says (e.g. „gasifications “in Dachau, Auschwitz numbers of victims etc.), then walks he for it if necessary for a very long time into the dungeon: ” One may not ask oneself, how such was possible a mass murder [to the Jew]… There is no debate over the existence of the gas chambers, and there may be also none. “(Le Monde, 21.2.1979) <<
At least in the last sentence it questions the gas chambers - that is Holocaustleugnung!

Daniel Stöhr: No Rudolfus,

he speaks of „the Auschwitz numbers of victims “, which were down-corrected some time ago by the there museum around millions.

Rudolfus: „Pater Lingen “speaks of Dachau and of Auschwitz

Auschwitz was an extermination camp - and which denies, which in Dachau KZ-passengers were tortured of the SS and also murdered, plays down the SS equally.

Who does not have notion from the SS-KZs, should not out-do as history teachers and against the European Union-Holocaustleugnergesetz offend!

Daniel Stöhr: Rudolfus,

what do you want to say with the quoted one? It does not state a serious historian that Dachau was an extermination camp.