The archbishop of Bamberg may make itself calm today on thick post office from Switzerland. In authoritarian clay/tone it is requested not to interfere into things which turn on it allegedly nothing.

(, Basel kreuz.net) the suspended former Pfarradministrator of the basellandschaftlichen Pfarrei Röschenz drifted in the Sektentum has archbishop Ludwig sends a letter written by Bamberg sent.

The former priest is inkardiniert in the ore diocese Bamberg. Since 1992 it is released for the service in Switzerland.

At the end of December hurried archbishop send from Bamberg after long hesitating to his bischöflichen Mitbruder in Basel, Mons. Kurt cook, to assistance.

As church Vorgesetzer Sabos it had requested this to quit its place with the Kirchgemeinde Röschenz.

In the letter the archbishop asked Sabo also whether he „obedience obligation opposite the Basler bishop “recognize its.

Purpose of the letter was after information of the Bamberger Generalvikars, Mons. George Kestel to receive „from Franz Sabo a personal answer to the questions about its understanding from churchness and certain regulations of the world-wide valid church right “.

Generalvikar Kestel designated it in an interview with Swiss on-line newspaper `espace.ch' condition untenable as one „“that the ex priest does after his suspending, as if nothing happened.

Brutal answer of the attorney

Sabo let the letter of its archbishop answer without farther ado by an attorney. The letter is written in a rabiaten and authoritarian clay/tone.

Thus the lawyer instructs to the archbishop to keep out from the conflict his mandator with the bishop of Basel.

The archbishop has Sabo apparent before two years „in a personal discussion assured “, he „will not interfere “.

The lawyer communicated to the archbishop that Sabo refuses itself giving its rebellion up: „A notice of the employer-employee relationship was never considered by my mandator. “

In addition she was not understood at the today's time about most members of the Kirchgemeinde „“- so the lawyer understanding.

It is the more incomprehensible that the erzbischöfliche letter was sent at one time, since a highest kantonales court stated validly that the withdrawal of the Missio came canonica allegedly „under injury of elementary procedural specifications “to conditions.

The lawyer accuses the archbishop of not to know this judgement.

_ with the priesterlichen and human obligation Sabos its archbishop opposite deal he with no word in.

© Pressestelle ore diocese Bamberg

Agiafortuni: Laicofundamentalismus in pure culture

only half-educated one believes the Fudamentalismus exists only within the religious range. History is full examples of Laicofundamentalismus. Not only the French revolution has it for the world view of modern humans raised, already the French rulers has it applied as it the interest of the State of the priority granted. With the French Revolutin it was assigned to another carrier. No more the ruler of birth, but the Demagoge that most voices on itself to combine understands is from now on to say to have. Recently a majority of the judges with the reason of everything acquired itself better to know this role arbitrarily.

The judgement of the Laicofundamentalisten of reading valley is a true Schandfleck for a state like Switzerland, to which to the liberal legal order professes itself.

clarissa colonia: Property understood!

Now also the appointment renouncement becomes understandably, thanks!

sacerdos helveticus: @Clarissa Colonia

Yes, thus in approximately the court judged.
Bishop Koch refuses inserting against the judgement appointment since it would recognize thereby the competence of church courts in internal-church questions.
Here you find the statement of the Diözesanbischofs
http://www.bistum-basel.ch/seite.php?na=1,1,0,84028…

clarissa colonia: Also in D

award and withdrawal can be examined missio (e.g. at religion teachers) in the civil courts, because there may not be quasi-professional ban because of the basiclegally guaranteed occupation freedom by arbitrary distribution/withdrawal! The church stallt for the award/withdrawal missio of the rules up, which must be examinable also in the civil courts in their application, dear Agiafortuni. Of restriction of church freedom one can speak there only if one means with it the freedom to arbitrariness.

Agiafortuni: clarissa colonia

One must assume the judges were to that extent bad willing as a contingent resolution are present. Volens nolens has it angemasst itself a decision substantial for the church to fall. Their behavior was therefore that from representatives of a judge state. For it the lack of suitability is characteristic

clarissa colonia: O, sacerdos,

I thank for your friendly clearing-up. Demand (only to understand): The responsible court judiziert thus: Pfr. needs missio for work contract; missio becomes after kirchl. Quite assign; missio must after kirchl. To be quite formally given and/or withdrawed; Distribution and withdrawal are examinable in the civil courts (because of meaning for work contract); Withdrawal happened formally insufficiently; Withdrawal futile, from there work contract valid. Is correct in such a way in?