Also the German state promotes Gotteslästerungen
The diocesan museum of the Viennese of cardinal is not the only place, where Jesus Christ is insulted. The model of the Diözesen is also an encouragement and an encouraging for other church-hostile circles.
(kreuz.net) the group of dances `Compagnie Felix Ruckert' made of Berlin specified the piece of dance at the Tanzbiennale in Venice „Messiah Game “.
The leader of the troop is a German dancer, Choreograph and author Felix Ruckert (48). Rückert is personally involved into the sadomasochistische scene. He is a state artist, who receives money since 1998 of the citizen of Berlin senate and internationally of the national Goethe institute one supports.
The cultural foundation of the Federal Republic and the Goethe institute Italy supported also the performance of „Messiah Game “in Venice with money.
In the piece Ruckert tries to make a connection between the Christianity and the sexual Perversion of the Sado Masochismus. „The Messiah “is seen in this sense as an individual, who embodies the role of gentleman and slave.
The piece presents five scenes from the New Testament. This concerns Jesu baptism in Jordan, the temptation in the desert, the last communion, the Kreuzigung and resurrection.
Among other things naked actors are shown, who castigate themselves mutually.
During the expiration the relations of the dancers is to each other emotional and physically characterized by power plays. The work circles to control and subjecting around the motive „“.
Now the initiative wants „children in danger “German Federal President Horst Köhler an appeal against Blasphemie and Gotteslästerung to send.
It is unclear whether the piece of jerk blank is intended also to the performance in the Viennese step Hans cathedral.
The leader of the troop is a German dancer, Choreograph and author Felix Ruckert (48). Rückert is personally involved into the sadomasochistische scene. He is a state artist, who receives money since 1998 of the citizen of Berlin senate and internationally of the national Goethe institute one supports.
The cultural foundation of the Federal Republic and the Goethe institute Italy supported also the performance of „Messiah Game “in Venice with money.
In the piece Ruckert tries to make a connection between the Christianity and the sexual Perversion of the Sado Masochismus. „The Messiah “is seen in this sense as an individual, who embodies the role of gentleman and slave.
The piece presents five scenes from the New Testament. This concerns Jesu baptism in Jordan, the temptation in the desert, the last communion, the Kreuzigung and resurrection.
Among other things naked actors are shown, who castigate themselves mutually.
During the expiration the relations of the dancers is to each other emotional and physically characterized by power plays. The work circles to control and subjecting around the motive „“.
Now the initiative wants „children in danger “German Federal President Horst Köhler an appeal against Blasphemie and Gotteslästerung to send.
It is unclear whether the piece of jerk blank is intended also to the performance in the Viennese step Hans cathedral.
All reader opinions indicate
6 of 33 reader opinions:
Tuesday, 15 April 2008 23:45
tapir †: @ Waltharius
Obviously assumptions and certification placing your method are wrong.
They operate with pure assumptions and speak for itself.
I did not talk at all at all and the pornography the word and reject these in principle.
I did not judge also of Michelangelo.
Quite the reverse - I admire it.
Its Schwulsein (even if you the expression does not fit - however contrary to „homosexual “that is a worth-free word, since it is not based on a former description of disease), thus its homophilen inclinations is naturally not at all a realization of „the science nowadays “, how you call it despektierlich, but is rather for centuries well-known.
I can recommend only urgently the reading of some standard works of the history of art - in particular the great collection of the Vatikan is worth to an intensive occupation.
The RKK is occupied for many centuries with it and only because you have of it no notion, needs you not in such a way to do, as if it acts around any obskuren things of „nowadays “.
In particular more than complicated relationship of the two gays of men Michelangelo and Pope Julius II, are for centuries the subject of the research and the literature.
Please only inform, then write!
They operate with pure assumptions and speak for itself.
I did not talk at all at all and the pornography the word and reject these in principle.
I did not judge also of Michelangelo.
Quite the reverse - I admire it.
Its Schwulsein (even if you the expression does not fit - however contrary to „homosexual “that is a worth-free word, since it is not based on a former description of disease), thus its homophilen inclinations is naturally not at all a realization of „the science nowadays “, how you call it despektierlich, but is rather for centuries well-known.
I can recommend only urgently the reading of some standard works of the history of art - in particular the great collection of the Vatikan is worth to an intensive occupation.
The RKK is occupied for many centuries with it and only because you have of it no notion, needs you not in such a way to do, as if it acts around any obskuren things of „nowadays “.
In particular more than complicated relationship of the two gays of men Michelangelo and Pope Julius II, are for centuries the subject of the research and the literature.
Please only inform, then write!
Tuesday, 15 April 2008 22:15
Waltharius: Wrong certification
@Tapir
The bent reader in this forum may fall its judgement! On the basis the way of writing the gentleman recognizes its sheep! Who endorses Gottlosigkeit, Pornografie or degenerate art, also certification for itself puts down! About it is designating to call Michelangelo gays a painter. It may have also been it, which determined the high-praised „science “nowadays! Its art was valid however the divine. This „modern “pageant does not serve certainly our Gläubigkeit, it lampoons it only. The faith does not need these „modernization “.
The bent reader in this forum may fall its judgement! On the basis the way of writing the gentleman recognizes its sheep! Who endorses Gottlosigkeit, Pornografie or degenerate art, also certification for itself puts down! About it is designating to call Michelangelo gays a painter. It may have also been it, which determined the high-praised „science “nowadays! Its art was valid however the divine. This „modern “pageant does not serve certainly our Gläubigkeit, it lampoons it only. The faith does not need these „modernization “.
Tuesday, 15 April 2008 19:17
tapir †: @ Waltharius
The night Zappen may quite please them by Pornosendungen! I want to believe that gladly, because of nothing different one you seem to be enthusiastic!
Dear Sir,
by adding to me with wild and groundless assumptions, discredit yourselves.
It is extremely improper and groundless and anti-like a Christian. Opposite others wrongly certification to put down is as well known a fundamental offence approximately God of requirements.
That you understand yourselves thus at all as a Christian, surprises me.
I will not go down on a similarly low level.
Dear Sir,
by adding to me with wild and groundless assumptions, discredit yourselves.
It is extremely improper and groundless and anti-like a Christian. Opposite others wrongly certification to put down is as well known a fundamental offence approximately God of requirements.
That you understand yourselves thus at all as a Christian, surprises me.
I will not go down on a similarly low level.
Tuesday, 15 April 2008 15:24
sexychrist: But itself then…
… aufgeilen at such Bildchen!
Tuesday, 15 April 2008 14:06
Waltharius: Spirit child
@Tapir
The night Zappen may quite please them by Pornosendungen! I want to believe that gladly, because of nothing different one you seem to be enthusiastic! I there quite follow the indignation of the believers! Art should always obtain a transmission, and which does not let itself „transmission “as request for ungezügelte Sexeslust now times - at least with my Christian self understanding to agree!
The night Zappen may quite please them by Pornosendungen! I want to believe that gladly, because of nothing different one you seem to be enthusiastic! I there quite follow the indignation of the believers! Art should always obtain a transmission, and which does not let itself „transmission “as request for ungezügelte Sexeslust now times - at least with my Christian self understanding to agree!
Tuesday, 15 April 2008 03:28
Mildret M: art must provoke and provoke new aspects
In principle: Art was always already provocative and must remain it and does not protect artists to leave fortunately not into its creative work to clean-talk itself - one thought of the lady, who provided before two years with its cross for attention and did not worry around the Austand of the engstirnigen small spirit.
The eternal assumptions, the insult and Gotteslästerung, approximately artistically is only the inability transacts to express the getting stuck material criticism. Instead of, > me personally pleases not, there… <, which would be quite legitimate and character strength would show, seizes one assures this or that one to abgelutschten Verallgemeinerungen.
From own experience I can say: Who feels connected really the art - respects not on such, usually unfounded, assumptions and cannot of it also be affected.
Mildret M (artist and Unternehmerin)
The eternal assumptions, the insult and Gotteslästerung, approximately artistically is only the inability transacts to express the getting stuck material criticism. Instead of, > me personally pleases not, there… <, which would be quite legitimate and character strength would show, seizes one assures this or that one to abgelutschten Verallgemeinerungen.
From own experience I can say: Who feels connected really the art - respects not on such, usually unfounded, assumptions and cannot of it also be affected.
Mildret M (artist and Unternehmerin)
All reader opinions indicate
27 further reader opinions
The editorship does not take responsibility for contents of the contributions. She reserves herself the right to delete contributions as well as to exclude readers from the debate.






