Pope Benedikt XVI. is sympathy carrier. It leaves the problematic topics blank - mass waste of the believers, child abortion, Homo Unzucht and divorce -. Press fragment to the Pope visit.

Professor latin

„It is a quiet voice, which announces itself here to word. It is the voice of a scholar, who does not have to convince by the Emphase of the speech, but by means of their contents. It is the voice of modest and fine-intimate humans, who do not try to score by volume and Theatralik. […] He reads out sentences, how they could have designed Kant, Fichte or Hegel. It is a speech, those the theological foundation supplies for the UN demanded by its predecessor as `moral Zentrum'. “

Alexander Swabian in a comment „relapse in professor latin “for `mirrors online' from 19 April.

The speech before the United Nations in the wording

Finally plain language?

„As it continues now? The catholic church in the USA has owing to the legal like illegal immigration of millions catholics from Latin America still 65 million believer. But whereupon it may not rest itself. Benedikt XVI knows. very probably. He knows also that acts his words must follow. Josef Ratzinger will remain in the intonation gentle and friendly, but behind locked doors with its colleagues in the USA - from the simple priest to the bishop - plain language will talk. Finally. “

From a comment of Peter Königsberger for `the general Zeitung' Mainz

Popularity instead of theology?

„This Pope from Marktl at the Inn, one may be now Benedikt fan or not, is able and able to large human gestures and outstanding heart quality. It did not make itself popular so far everywhere and all the time, approximately by Regensburg the attack on Mohammed or the recent Fürbitten unjustified demand to the Jews, they would like to recognize nevertheless Jesus as God a son. But beyond these theological refinement the Pope can reach also into the popular subject of the Mitmenschlichkeit. “

From a comment of Albert Franz in the Oberpfälzer regional newspaper `the new Tag'.

Historical event

„With its visit in the park East Synagogue of Manhattan has Pope Benedikt XVI. on Friday the dialogue between Jews and Christian a new impulse given. Rabbi Arthur Schneier, a native Viennese, who survived the hell of National Socialist Jew pursuit as a young person in Budapest, welcomed the Pope to the scarcely halfhour meeting and spoke of one `historical Ereignis'. “
From a report of the Austrian catholic press agency `Kathpress' from 19 April

It cannot differently

„In their inside the church to today few holds from the rights of the Mrs., the sexual minorities, in addition, from the division of power or the legal hearing for fallible believer. In the last days the media in the USA ran again the risk to superelevate Benedikt to the world conscience. “

The anti-church journalist Swiss `Tagesanzeiger', of the Michael Meier, in a comment on the Pope speech before the UN.

Moving declaration of bankruptcy

„With shameful lowered head Benedikt sounded itself the fates of the victims, held their hands and prayed together with them” father the ours “. Tears flowed. A moving meeting, as three concerning gave later to minutes. […] The payments of compensation to the amount of altogether more than two billion US Dollar led six Diözesen into the bankruptcy. “

From an article of Swiss regional newspaper `pc. Galler Tagblatt' from 19 April.

iudex †: @matt2

Do not let by my contradiction into a faith crisis fall itself, but when in the core divine nature I cannot see myself…
A blind Dogmatiker am not I (my large authority is the Bible, not the Denzinger Hünermann! Even if some here possibly as Protestant scolding, I am nevertheless catholic) and I will not also anmaßen myself to judge of your Rechtgläubigkeit or any Exkommunikationen express (first can, must and does not want I not, consider the latter I directly ridiculous!). But I would like to stress that I can begin personally with the idea of man of the Bible very much, which sees humans as and (ideally) a referred nature creative on God. Those became humans rises from its Geschöpflichkeit (and from it resulting „the dependence “on, and relationshipness on God). Even a divine nature to be or a divine spark in me be carried, waked would have - does not correspond simply to my idea of man and I think makes me undignified or not mickrig as humans!
They will have to live with the fact that I your opinion will not be, but I am very convinced that you can bear that, or?

Wolfenmondladislaus: Kant: Carl you Prel discovered forgotten lectures

Carl you Prel (1839 - 1899)

German philosopher, who studied philosophy still in its service as a Bavarian officer. it attained a doctorate to 1868 due to a thesis over the dream interpretation, which received unusual attention, at the philosophical faculty of the University of T5ubingen. He is the founder of a transzendentalen, monistischen psychology, in which he seeks to overcome both the materialistic Monismus and its Chemismus of the spirit and dualism soul body come by the theses of the Spiritualismus into unsolvable contradictions.

If forces are present, which do not stick to the organism, then the carrier of these forces must necessarily outlast death, and then evenly of will consist its jenseitige existence way making from these forces use.
Off: Carl you Prel: The mystery of humans. An introduction to the study of the secret sciences (S.94-107)
Again given change, by way of introduction, and commentates from Dr. Herbert Frit supplements
R. Löwit. Wiesbaden

A further possible answering on of advocates of the rationalism again and again maintained „absolute realization border “after Kant would be that Kant (in the works quoted by them) referred only to the outside senses.
Not however on the internal senses. And there meditation and meditation at all not mentioned and as changed consciousness conditions with included.

matt2 †: @iudex: They throw also only with dogmas around itself…

there hold I already mean insights for more intelligent than the their. You are calmly bare creature. I do not want to make this self-assessment madig for you. Who can seize it, it seizes.

But I do not have it made madig me by you also that I am God son in the full sense of the nature equality and thus principle of all creation. And it is me honestly no matter how itself with catholic theology agreed upon.

I have myself never sheared around the spirituality of the church. For me the popular culture was always substantially more informative and more edifying than the Getue in the churches.

I am related to God the father. I do not need Jesus, but I deny him just as little. I am me my own Messiah.

Kath. the church will assume in me certainly only renegades and the anti-Christians. Their mental naivety shows it in me nothing else. Therefore it is also not my church.

If they want to know who my church are… it are such humans like the Falco of one were. Those represent me. And even if their self-manifestation and its way of life appear destructive sworn in catholic, then the nature is behind it the universal genius of the creation and at honest devotion not to over-bid.

But I mean that the popular culture grows quite also from the catholic and/or Christian environment. This new church thus quite took over qualities of the old, but my spirit is inherent in it, not to your.

iudex †: @matt2:

I do not understand the sentence really:
„Divine consciousness is potentially in humans given. “Meaning it consciousness (humans) that there is a God? Or do they mean God own consciousness, which is also in humans?
Consider the latter I just as wrong, as your statement:
„I go saying so far: humans are potential God. “,
which I do not understand indeed, since between God and humans no more gradually separate a substantial, thus nature-moderate difference exists, which can be never overcome also by a still so enormous „high development “of humans. Humans are not stop a God (with only one exception, and also with that become göttl. and menschl. - Nature with all unit also clearly divorced!) - and he becomes also none!
That does not have to do also with Aristos act power pattern nothing!
Even the Diktum of the old alexandrinischen theologian: „God became humans, on that humans are not vergöttlicht “, which seems to be similar at first sight their statement mean nature-moderate change of humans, but an approach of humans to God in the sense that released humans God can find as its opposite - in the proximity of God are, but determine no God become! Humans are creative as a creature on its creator and find his fulfillment in the community with him; but it is not in the power to become equal Gtt!
Like that I am not indeed convinced of your theses!

matt2 †: @iudex: what appears to you at my thoughts so abstrusely?

I believe you place myself intentionally ignorantly. Divine consciousness is potentially in humans given. Nichs other one is called the sentence: heaven is in you. I go saying so far: humans are potential God. What is so difficult to it to understand? If you do not understand that, then you can understand actually also, how from a mustard grain a mustard tree grows. You never which of the aristotelischen act power teachings heard?

Each development movement is the realization of a given potential. Which it is so abwägig to remember that God is the true potential and consciousness of humans. One would have to actually ask: as one is to think it otherwise.

iudex †: @matt2 - alias hobby Kant, alias liking gladly spruce…

They set a contribution off here - all note! That I still this week in one of my seminars to my student will submit!
„… (God), whose consciousness is hidden at least as possibility in us. Therefore Jesus says: „heaven is in you “. It is first like a mustard grain, but it is basicput in humans. “
God Bewußsein is thus as possibility in us hidden and like a mustard grain in humans basicput. Thus God does consciousness in humans base and is one (bare?) Possibility? Or did you mean the knowledge of God? And that is also only one possibility?

„Due to which motivation however we become which we are - although one can never speak of a Determinismus, but by freiwillentlicher decision in the sense of our divine potential?. “Which has motivation with „Deteriminismus “(?) to do??
What „is a divine potential “? Can humans become God? Is it already?

„Crucial is thereby less their Aufrichigkeit than their will. And there are humans those it pleases them in certain kind anzuhangen and to huldigen. And in such a way I actually see man and woman. „The mental man “is the divine ambition, the woman is the huldigende spirit, which bears and bears mental body this ambition. “You give this theory at the best one times in cheerful round of itself! Success will be overwhelming! There no trousers remain drying!
In Ernst: What wanted to say your contribution to us?