On the objection that one cannot convince others, if one does not believe to say the truth glided the professor in the shallow.

(kreuz.net) it is perhaps no coincidence that among the German bishops nobody crystallized except cardinal Lehmann as „formed head “.

The explained Karl Josef Kuschel (59) on 9 March in an interview with `Inforadio'.

`Inforadio' is a public news station with seat, common in Berlin and Brandenburg, in Berlin.

Kuschel was an assistant former of Tübingen of theology professor Hw. Hans Küng and teaches today in T5ubingen „theology of the culture and the inter+religious dialogue “.

Besides Kuschel is vice-president from Hw. Küng created foundation Weltethos.

According to him it is missing with the German bishops at coining/shaping, formed heads, „also quite conservatively to be can, however on intellectual level with large radiant emittance, with large internal reliability the thing of the church represented can “- in such a way to Kuschel in interview.

Church representatives such as cardinal Joachim Meisner of Cologne it wants not to let be considered as formed head: „Those are shapes, which polarize the public rather. “

My it not: „I mean figures, which the thing of the church communicate in such a way that also a secular not-church public becomes attentive, and say, oh, which are represented for our current time bitterly necessarily. “

For the question of the priesterlichen Ehelosigkeit Kuschel agrees with the chairman of the German bishop conference, archbishop Robert Zollitsch of Freiburg, that one must set the Zölibat „again and again “on the agenda:

„The emergency of the church walk to the sky, which concerns the personale situation “.

The theologian finds it frightening that one got accustomed „to a kind cemetery peace “.

In the interview he speaks also about the inter+religious dialogue and interprets Judentum and Islam as „indication of God “:

„I am convinced of it that the simultaneous presence of the God certification by Jews and Muslims is to protect me as a Christian, to in-encase me to verabsolutieren in my truth understanding. “

The presence of the others is an indication that God „enrich yourself, more comprehensively and the more largely “testify to let wants, by alleged „faith witnesses also outside of the church. “

That is „like that something like a dehydration prophylaxis and thus a pride prophylaxis. “

„We are not the only God children. “
God can be testified „obviously “also by other witnesses in its truth, in his size and majesty.

Kuschel believes that God loves the competition: „God hates those, which want to monopolize. “

It request to the contest: „If one is in the contest, has one with one another not yet the truth in the possession, but has the truth as process “.

The Interviewpartnerin of the professor shows up from its again-pious appeals unimpressed. He objects that one can hardly convince others, if one is not convinced to say the truth.

In his answer the professor glides in the shallow: If the conviction that God is the love, which is deepest and the latter, which the Christian states over God, „then the competition consists of it that I provoke the other one, seeing possibly also in such a way. “

It is provoked by the others to show „which means it that God is love, and that he loves all equal humans “- the professor drives on pauschalisierend.

A happy error of the Pope
Then Kuschel praises the letter of 138 Muslim scholars to the representatives of all large Christian churches: „That is an outrageous document, that has it never given in the history Islam. “

The Interviewpartnerin points out that the letter was Regensburg a consequence of the provocation by the speech of the Pope.

Kuschel affirms: „We know since the Osterliturgie the speech of the happy debt. “

The Pope has at that time a happy error made „with this had an accident quotation “.

The consequence of the brotherly love in relation to the other religions is to learn „much from the other one to in order to understand it still more deeply and better. “

Otherwise the speech of brotherly love, of love, of God love is only a pure cliche.

Then the professor is responded to humans in all religions, which would think „in a fundamentalist way “.

Kuschel tries to understand: „Nevertheless it does not fall and continues to ask from the sky “explains: „As one becomes in such a way, with tunnel view, with anti-modernistic prejudices. With enemy picture production. What are there for psychological needs there? “

Nevertheless one may not play the force against dialogue efforts. That is the danger:

„Against it my scientific basic research, against the simple, turns terrible simple on all sides, which would have it most of all binaryistic, because they need concepts of the enemy. “

© frontispiece: Just Fluff, CC

Pünktchen: God hard

look on your Muslim neighbours - and learn its to believe and his religion and its live - and try it to understand.

Exactly I began that years ago! To understand I know the Muslim very well, because I take the theories Koran seriously, where others - allegedly informs people - do not even take her to the knowledge. It irritates some Muslims who adjusted themselves to the fact that in the west understanding is confounded here with ignorance. The latter leads to an approval from indifference. Awaking with most is then very rough and with the realization connected for many decades the threatening development to have overslept. Recent example: Günther Wallraff!

Vibrate: Bravo, Mr. professor Kuschel - everything correctly

They exceed her teacher Hans Küng in light view!

Yes, except cardinal Lehmann really gives it to the DBK no head meaning somehow. All average. And Wolfgang Huber unfortunately is from the other faculty.

wede johannes1: God and its children

it is already nearly anmassend to express itself in such a way whether we are now God children or not; God stands over the things. Therefore it, if one has reverence before God, would be very meaningful to omit, who now which from God or not from God is. To God to pray may be meaningful. Nonsense is it however quasi God going by to be interpreted, which it thinks, means or does now.
God is God and any Deuteln at it is to be omitted; which he means or is evenly not its thing. wede

möchtegern kathole: „The emergency of the church walk to the sky, which concerns the personale situation “.

But from the bad experiences of the past 40 years one can say:: Quality before quantity - everyone dedicate, which wants itself such a nice life financiers, but only those, with those indications of an actual appointment can be recognized.

God hard: @pünktchen

I know brotherly love only - as the term says - humans to prove, who are me close!
look on your Muslim neighbours - and learn its to believe and his religion and its live - and try it to understand.

Pünktchen: Which brotherly love is, I know…

But „brotherly love in relation to the other religions “?

I know brotherly love only - as the term says - humans to prove, who are me close! But world view systems, religions, associations, authorities, club, parties… I can prove „brotherly love to those “?

Pure Schwafelei!